Bitcoin’s Midterm Bottom Pattern May Already Be Broken: What a 40 Percent Recovery Means for Your Next Buy

With the U.S. midterm elections now just days away, bitcoin investors are staring at a pattern that has repeated for over a decade — and this year, bitcoin appears to be breaking it. Historically, bitcoin hit its deepest bear-market lows shortly after the 2014, 2018 and 2022 midterms. But according to CoinDesk analyst James Van Straten, this cycle’s low arrived 125 days before Election Day, and the price has already recovered roughly 40 percent from it. If you have been waiting for an election-season crash before buying, the data suggests the market may have already moved on without you.

By Sarah Park | October 24, 2026

The Hook: A 10-Year Pattern Meets an Uncooperative Market

Bitcoin’s history with U.S. midterm elections is striking. As CoinDesk’s James Van Straten documented on October 23, bitcoin bottomed in January 2015, December 2018 and November 2022 — each time shortly after the preceding midterm vote. Those lows arrived approximately 71, 38 and 13 days after election day, respectively. The pattern was consistent enough that “buy the midterm bottom” became part of crypto investing folklore.

This year is different. Bitcoin’s lowest price of the cycle so far came on July 1, when it touched 57,850 USD — 125 days before the November 3 election. By October 22, the price had recovered to around 81,455 USD, roughly 40 percent above that low. Bitcoin trades near 81,600 USD at the time of writing, per the batch price snapshot.

The Evidence: What the Numbers Actually Show

  • 57,850 USD — bitcoin’s cycle low on July 1, 2026, four months before the midterms (CoinDesk)
  • Roughly 40 percent — bitcoin’s recovery from that low by October 22, to around 81,455 USD
  • 29 percent and 37 percent — bitcoin’s declines in the six months before the 2018 and 2022 midterms
  • Down about 6 percent — bitcoin’s move over the past 30 days, matching the tech-heavy QQQ index
  • Up 26 percent over 90 days — bitcoin’s gain over three months, versus a 3 percent gain for QQQ

The pre-election weakness of past cycles is real: bitcoin fell approximately 29 percent in the six months before the 2018 midterms and 37 percent before the 2022 vote. But this year, the opposite happened. Instead of cratering into November, bitcoin spent the autumn climbing away from its summer lows.

The Core Conflict: Election Jinx or Market Cycle?

Here is the question every investor should ask: did midterms actually cause those previous bottoms, or was the timing a coincidence? Van Straten’s analysis leans toward coincidence. He compared bitcoin to the Invesco QQQ Trust, a basket of large technology stocks, and found the tech pattern far less consistent. QQQ fell roughly 23 percent from the end of September to its December 2018 low, with much of the decline occurring after election day. It dropped 17 percent in the three months before the 2022 vote. But it gained 17 percent in the six months before the 2014 midterms.

If elections truly drove asset prices, tech stocks should show the same rhythm bitcoin did. They don’t. The conclusion, per CoinDesk: bitcoin’s recurring midterm weakness more likely reflects bitcoin’s own internal market cycles — the boom-and-bust rhythm of halvings, leverage flushes and investor sentiment — that merely happened to line up with election years. Think of it like an umbrella seller noticing rain every four years and crediting the calendar, when the weather system has its own logic.

What This Means for Your Portfolio

Three practical takeaways for regular investors:

  • Don’t wait for a “guaranteed” post-election crash. The historical bottom pattern already failed its test this cycle — the July low came months before the vote. Anchoring your buying strategy to an election calendar could mean waiting for a dip that never comes.
  • Expect volatility anyway. Bitcoin and QQQ are both down about 6 percent over the past month, and technology stocks hit their own turbulence after QQQ’s record high of 762.86 USD on October 6. Short-term swings around the election are likely regardless of the pattern.
  • Zoom out to the 90-day view. Bitcoin is up 26 percent over three months while tech stocks gained just 3 percent. The longer trend still favors bitcoin, even with the recent pullback from around 86,000 USD earlier in October.

The Verdict

Patterns are useful until they break, and bitcoin’s midterm-bottom pattern looks broken in 2026. The July 1 low at 57,850 USD may well be remembered as this cycle’s bottom — arrived early, without an election invitation. That does not mean November will be calm; it means the election is probably not the force driving bitcoin’s price. For long-term holders, that is a healthy reminder to build strategies on market fundamentals rather than four-year folklore.

The cryptocurrency market remains highly volatile. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

14 thoughts on “Bitcoin’s Midterm Bottom Pattern May Already Be Broken: What a 40 Percent Recovery Means for Your Next Buy”

  1. everyone waiting for the classic midterm crash and the low already happened july 1 at 57,850. 125 days early. pattern traders in shambles

    1. 40 percent off the lows while bears chant just wait for november lol. some people need the crash more than they need the entry

    2. @cycle_wen 57,850 on july 1 and the pattern crew still shorting november. at some point you admit the sample was three coin flips

  2. The QQQ comparison is the strongest part of Van Straten”’s argument. If elections truly drove the cycle, tech should show the same rhythm and it plainly doesn”’t.

  3. the 2018 and 2022 lows landing 38 and 13 days after the vote always felt like numerology. halving math explains those bottoms better than ballots do

  4. the low was 125 days before the midterms and half of ct is still waiting for an election crash lol. 57k came and went in july

    1. 57k in july also printed while etfs were still net accumulating. the dip buyers already bought, probably why november keeps refusing to crash

  5. Van Straten is solid but three midterms is a tiny sample. Calling the pattern broken on one data point feels like narrative fitting more than analysis.

    1. three data points plus 2014 and people build a trading calendar around it. the halving sits roughly 18 months before every midterm low, nobody wants to credit the boring explanation

      1. @Sten O. the halving offset point deserves way more airtime. every midterm low sits 12 to 18 months after a halving, the calendar everyone trades is the halving in a costume

  6. question for the pattern people: if the low printed 125 days early because etfs changed the holder base, what does that say about every other historical stat we trade on

  7. 40 percent off the low plus the dwf flow study showing etfs chase prices fits perfectly. the midterm crash thesis needed forced sellers and there are none left in the structure

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BTC$80,727.00-0.6%ETH$2,370.15-0.5%SOL$102.24-1.0%BNB$735.02+0.7%XRP$1.29-1.3%ADA$0.2087-1.5%DOGE$0.0779-0.9%DOT$1.07-3.2%AVAX$8.95-1.6%LINK$11.72-1.6%UNI$6.88-1.5%ATOM$1.69-1.2%LTC$56.69-3.2%ARB$0.1716-3.7%NEAR$4.64-4.8%FIL$0.9498-2.6%SUI$0.9516-2.1%BTC$80,727.00-0.6%ETH$2,370.15-0.5%SOL$102.24-1.0%BNB$735.02+0.7%XRP$1.29-1.3%ADA$0.2087-1.5%DOGE$0.0779-0.9%DOT$1.07-3.2%AVAX$8.95-1.6%LINK$11.72-1.6%UNI$6.88-1.5%ATOM$1.69-1.2%LTC$56.69-3.2%ARB$0.1716-3.7%NEAR$4.64-4.8%FIL$0.9498-2.6%SUI$0.9516-2.1%
Scroll to Top