Coinbase has uncovered evidence that federal regulators pressured banks to restrict services for cryptocurrency companies, according to Freedom of Information Act documents released on November 2, 2024. The revelations shine a light on the behind-the-scenes regulatory friction that has constrained DeFi growth even as the sector’s total value locked more than doubled over the course of the year.
The documents, obtained through FOIA requests filed by History Associates Incorporated on behalf of Coinbase, detail how the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation allegedly pressured banks serving the digital asset industry. The findings arrive at a critical moment for DeFi, which has experienced explosive growth despite what appears to be systematic regulatory headwinds.
TL;DR
- Coinbase FOIA documents reveal FDIC pressured banks to restrict crypto company services
- 15% deposit cap allegedly imposed on Signature Bank, Customers Bank, Cross River Bank, Western Alliance, and Silvergate
- DeFi total value locked more than doubled in 2024, led by lending and liquid staking protocols
- Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal filed two FOIA requests targeting FDIC and OCC transparency
- ETH staking grew significantly throughout 2024 as EigenLayer restaking debate intensified
The 15% Deposit Cap
At the center of the Coinbase revelations is an alleged 15% deposit cap that the FDIC imposed on banks with significant cryptocurrency exposure. According to the FOIA filings, this cap was applied to several well-known financial institutions including Signature Bank, Customers Bank, Cross River Bank, Western Alliance Bank, and Silvergate Bank — all of which had built reputations as crypto-friendly banking partners.
Coinbase’s chief legal officer Paul Grewal filed two FOIA requests on October 18. The first sought clarification on the deposit cap policy, requesting all communications between FDIC board members, staff, depository institutions, and officials from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency dating back to June 2022. The second request demanded FOIA logs from the FDIC and OCC spanning January 2022 through October 2024, submitted in text-searchable format to ensure transparency.
The disclosure drew a sharp response from Custodia Bank CEO Caitlyn Long, who characterized federal banking regulators’ approach to crypto-serving banks as “lawlessness.” For DeFi protocols that rely on fiat on-ramps and banking partnerships to operate, these restrictions have created a tangible bottleneck between traditional finance and decentralized platforms.
DeFi Growth Defies Regulatory Headwinds
Despite the regulatory pressure revealed in the FOIA documents, DeFi has thrived in 2024. Total value locked across the ecosystem more than doubled over the year, with lending protocols and liquid staking platforms leading the charge. Lido Finance maintained its position as the largest DeFi protocol by TVL, while Aave continued to dominate the lending space.
Ethereum staking grew steadily throughout 2024, supported by the maturation of liquid staking derivatives and the emergence of restaking platforms. EigenLayer, which enables ETH holders to restake their assets to secure additional protocols, sparked intense debate within the Ethereum community about whether restaking adds genuine value or introduces systemic risk. The ethfinance community remained divided, with some contributors arguing that EigenLayer has been a net negative for the ecosystem so far.
The growth has not been without setbacks. Radiant Capital’s $58 million exploit in October served as a sobering reminder that DeFi security remains a work in progress. The protocol’s successful restoration of lending markets on Ethereum and Base in early November demonstrated recovery capabilities, but also highlighted the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between developers and attackers.
BTC Dominance Casts Shadow Over DeFi Tokens
While DeFi TVL grew impressively in absolute terms, Bitcoin’s dominance reached 60.5% on November 2 — a three-year high that compressed the relative performance of DeFi governance tokens and altcoins. Bitcoin traded around $69,289, with Ethereum at $2,491, according to CoinMarketCap data. The broader market capitalization stood at $2.67 trillion, with a Fear and Greed Index reading of 49 indicating neutral sentiment.
Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded $54.94 million in net outflows on November 1, breaking a seven-day inflow streak. Ethereum spot ETFs fared worse, with $10.93 million in outflows bringing cumulative flows to negative $491.44 million. The outflows suggest that even institutional vehicles for crypto exposure are experiencing hesitation ahead of the U.S. presidential election on November 5.
For DeFi tokens specifically, the rising Bitcoin dominance means that even as protocol fundamentals improve and TVL grows, token prices have not always kept pace. This divergence between protocol utility and token valuation remains one of the sector’s most discussed structural challenges.
What the FOIA Revelations Mean for DeFi
The Coinbase FOIA disclosures have implications that extend beyond exchange-bank relationships. If regulators have been systematically restricting banking access for crypto companies, DeFi protocols face a compounded challenge: they must build robust decentralized infrastructure while simultaneously navigating a hostile regulatory environment that limits their connection to traditional financial rails.
Stablecoin access — critical for DeFi lending, borrowing, and trading — depends heavily on banking partnerships. The alleged 15% deposit cap directly affects the ability of stablecoin issuers and DeFi platforms to maintain adequate fiat reserves. This creates a paradox where DeFi promises financial independence but remains tethered to the traditional banking system it aims to supplement.
As the industry awaits the outcome of the U.S. election, the FOIA revelations add another layer of urgency to the regulatory debate. A crypto-friendly administration could accelerate the removal of these banking restrictions, while a continuation of current policy would likely perpetuate the friction that has defined the DeFi-banking relationship since 2022.
Why This Matters
The Coinbase FOIA revelations confirm what many in the DeFi space have long suspected: regulatory pressure on crypto-friendly banks has been systematic and intentional, not incidental. The alleged 15% deposit cap on institutions like Signature Bank and Silvergate represents a direct constraint on the fiat infrastructure that DeFi protocols depend on. Yet the fact that DeFi TVL still doubled in 2024 speaks to the sector’s fundamental resilience. The question heading into 2025 is whether regulatory clarity — or continued obstruction — will determine whether DeFi can fully bridge the gap between decentralized innovation and traditional financial access.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own research before making investment decisions.
273 billion market cap doubling showed digital assets were outperforming everything