We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept," you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
$50B TVL in BTC restaking is just the beginning. Babylon and the native restaking protocols are finally making productive use of the dormant BTC capital without compromising security.
The trust assumptions are what worry me. Wrapped BTC on ETH was step one, but native restaking without bridges? That’s the real innovation here. Babylon’s slashable stake model is fascinating.
btc holders finally getting yield without wrapping or bridging. this is the unlock. $50b is massive and we’re still early
The article does a great job explaining why native restaking matters versus the wrapped BTC approaches. Counterparty risk is the silent killer in DeFi — removing bridges removes the attack vector.
proof of stake was always eth’s game. now btc gets to play too without changing the base layer. brilliant