The United States Securities and Exchange Commission issued a rare no-action letter to Fuse Crypto Limited on November 24, 2025, confirming that the Solana-based decentralized physical infrastructure network’s reward token would not be treated as a security. The decision, which became widely discussed across the crypto industry on November 29, represents the second such letter granted to a DePIN project this year and marks a significant shift in how regulators approach AI-integrated blockchain infrastructure.
The Agentic Protocol
Fuse operates as a decentralized energy network on Solana, rewarding participants who maintain and operate green energy infrastructure. The protocol’s design is deliberately utilitarian: the FUSE token rewards users who contribute computing resources and energy to the network, and its smart contract architecture restricts speculative use cases. Tokens can only be redeemed at an average market price through third-party intermediaries, creating a mechanism that aligns token utility with actual network throughput rather than trading demand.
This architecture places Fuse firmly in the emerging category of AI-coordinated DePIN networks, where autonomous agents manage resource allocation across distributed physical infrastructure. The protocol’s energy grid management requires real-time optimization that increasingly relies on machine learning algorithms to balance supply and demand across decentralized nodes, making it a compelling example of how AI and blockchain are converging at the infrastructure layer.
Neural Network Integration
The SEC’s decision to grant no-action relief was influenced by the token’s clear utility design. Fuse submitted its request on November 19, 2025, outlining how the FUSE token supports genuine network activity rather than functioning as an investment contract. The token rewards network maintainers, restricts speculative mechanisms, and maintains a redemption structure tied to actual service delivery. Consensys lawyer Bill Hughes captured the industry’s reaction succinctly, stating that “there is not a lawyer in crypto that would have thought this token was a security.”
The regulatory clarity provided by this no-action letter has immediate implications for AI-driven DePIN projects across the ecosystem. Akash Network, which is developing its own Blockchain Managed Entity tokenomics with USD-pegged tokens for compute pricing, represents another project that could benefit from this precedent. The Akash Supercloud platform, which offers decentralized GPU computing at approximately $1.20 per hour compared to AWS’s $4.50 for equivalent H100 capacity, is positioning itself as the decentralized backbone for AI training and inference workloads.
Token Utility
What distinguishes the current wave of DePIN tokens from earlier crypto iterations is their direct connection to measurable physical output. Fuse tokens represent energy contributed to a decentralized grid. Akash tokens represent compute power delivered to real workloads. Render tokens represent GPU cycles completed for actual rendering jobs. This grounding in tangible utility makes these projects inherently more defensible from a regulatory perspective than purely speculative tokens.
The SEC’s acknowledgment that utility-focused tokens can operate outside securities regulation creates a clearer path for AI-crypto projects to structure their tokenomics. Projects that can demonstrate genuine network utility, restricted speculative mechanisms, and transparent redemption processes now have a concrete regulatory template to follow.
Potential Bottlenecks
Despite the positive regulatory signal, challenges remain. The no-action letter applies specifically to Fuse’s described operations and does not create binding precedent for other projects. Each DePIN or AI-crypto protocol must still navigate its own regulatory evaluation, and the SEC’s approach could shift with future leadership changes. Additionally, the distinction between utility tokens and securities can become blurred as projects evolve and tokens develop secondary market characteristics that extend beyond their original utility design.
The Solana network’s own performance characteristics also present considerations for DePIN projects. While Solana’s high throughput and low transaction costs make it attractive for infrastructure applications, network reliability remains a concern for projects managing real-world energy grids or compute workloads where downtime has tangible consequences.
Final Verdict
The SEC’s no-action letter for Fuse represents a meaningful milestone in the regulatory maturation of AI-crypto infrastructure. With Bitcoin trading near $90,850, Ethereum at $2,990, and Solana at $136, the broader market context supports continued development in the DePIN and AI-crypto space. The combination of regulatory clarity, genuine utility, and growing demand for decentralized computing and energy infrastructure suggests that projects bridging AI and blockchain are entering a more sustainable growth phase. The projects that will thrive are those that maintain strict utility alignment, transparent tokenomics, and demonstrable real-world value creation.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making trading decisions.
second DePIN no-action letter this year and nobody is talking about it. SEC saying FUSE rewards arent a security because tokens redeem at market price through intermediaries is a huge precedent
the utility restriction is the key detail. FUSE tokens cant be used for speculation, only redeemed for actual network throughput. thats what makes it pass the howey test
sec no action letter for fuse on solana based depin energy network with fuse token not a security
second no-action letter for a DePIN project this year. SEC is slowly building a framework through individual rulings
depin_bull_ SEC building framework through individual rulings is the most American approach possible. no comprehensive legislation just case by case precedent
second no action letter for DePIN and both on solana. the chain is quietly becoming the default for physical infrastructure
sol_validator solana getting both DePIN no-action letters is a moat. regulators picked their preferred chain and it wasnt ethereum or bitcoin L2s
second DePIN no-action letter this year is a signal. SEC figuring out that infrastructure tokens with constrained utility are not securities. FUSE only redeemable at market price through intermediaries is the key design
the key detail: tokens can only be redeemed at average market price through intermediaries. thats what makes it not a security in the SECs eyes
raj k the redemption through intermediaries at average market price is what makes this work. removes the speculative angle entirely
energy_punk tokens redeemed at average market price after the nov 24 2025 letter changes the game
the key innovation here is removing the speculative angle. if tokens can only be redeemed at average market price, theres no pump and dump incentive. SEC recognized that distinction
sec no action for fuse on solana depin rewards for green energy, second one this year
fuse token rewards green energy infra, this could open doors for more depin projects
Fuse running on Solana makes sense for this use case. fast finality, low fees for energy grid micropayments
solana_depin fuse crypto limited getting that sec clarity for the energy network is huge
AI-coordinated energy grid management on blockchain is actually a use case that makes sense. not everything in DePIN is vaporware
second no-action letter for a DePIN project and both on Solana. the chain is quietly becoming the regulatory-friendly option for physical infrastructure networks
no-action letters are the SECs way of saying we looked at this and its fine without making it law. DePIN projects can build on that precedent
Fuse restricting redemption to average market price kills the speculation angle entirely. its basically a utility voucher not a tradable asset. SEC understood the difference
Lars T. the average market price redemption is genius design honestly. removes the speculative upside that attracts SEC scrutiny while keeping the utility intact. more DePIN projects should copy this
Lars T. average market price redemption is clever but it also means the token will never appreciate. investors get utility not upside. SEC loves that framing
two DePIN no-action letters both on Solana and nobody is talking about what that means for other chains. Ethereum L2s got passed over because the fee economics dont work for microtransactions
Eun-ji P. solana getting both DePIN letters is not an accident. sub cent fees and 400ms finality make microtransactions actually viable. ethereum L2s still cant do that reliably