The Strategy Outline
As October 2019 unfolds, the decentralized finance ecosystem finds itself at an inflection point. Bitcoin hovers around $7,493, Ethereum trades at $162, and the total value locked across DeFi protocols sits near $650 million. For yield farmers searching for returns in a market that has spent months grinding sideways, the landscape offers a curious mix of caution and opportunity.
The dominant strategy in DeFi circles centers on stablecoin yield generation. With BTC posting a modest 0.15% daily loss and ETH barely moving, traders are rotating capital into lending protocols and liquidity pools that offer consistent returns regardless of directional price action. MakerDAO, Compound, and Uniswap form the core triangle of yield opportunities, each offering distinct risk-reward profiles.
MakerDAO stands at the center of attention this week as its Multi-Collateral DAI upgrade enters an extended audit phase. The transition from Single-Collateral DAI (SAI) to a multi-collateral system has been in progress for months, and the current audit period — reportedly spanning approximately ten weeks as of late October — represents the final gate before the system goes live. For yield farmers, this upgrade is not merely a technical milestone. It fundamentally changes the collateral landscape, allowing users to generate DAI against Ethereum-based assets beyond just ETH.
Smart Contract Architecture
MakerDAO’s current architecture relies on a single collateral type — ETH — locked in Collateral Debt Positions (CDPs). Users generate DAI by over-collateralizing their positions, maintaining a minimum collateralization ratio that fluctuates based on governance decisions. The system’s stability fee, effectively the interest rate borrowers pay on their generated DAI, sits at levels designed to keep DAI pegged to $1.
The Multi-Collateral DAI (MCD) upgrade introduces several architectural changes that matter for yield strategists. First, it enables multiple vault types, each corresponding to a different collateral asset with its own risk parameters. Second, it introduces the DAI Savings Rate (DSR), a native yield mechanism that allows DAI holders to earn interest simply by locking their DAI in a smart contract. Third, the system adds a liquidation auction mechanism that replaces the single-price liquidation model with a Dutch auction system designed to recover more value during market stress.
For context, Compound’s lending protocol currently offers annualized yields ranging from 2% to 8% on stablecoin deposits, depending on utilization rates. Uniswap’s automated market maker pools generate trading fees for liquidity providers, with ETH/DAI and ETH/USDC pairs attracting the most capital. The DSR, once live, is expected to offer a baseline yield that competes directly with these existing options, potentially drawing significant capital away from competing protocols.
Risk vs. Reward
Yield farming in October 2019 carries a distinct risk profile that traders must weigh carefully. Smart contract risk remains the primary concern. Every DeFi protocol is essentially an experiment running on mainnet, and the attack surface grows with each new integration. MakerDAO’s extended audit period for MCD reflects this reality — the team is taking a measured approach rather than rushing to market.
Liquidity risk presents the second major consideration. While DeFi TVL has grown substantially over the past year, the ecosystem remains small compared to traditional finance. A sudden market move — like the 12% BTC pump following Xi Jinping’s blockchain endorsement on October 24 — can trigger cascading liquidations across leveraged positions. CDPs with thin collateral buffers face liquidation, Uniswap pool impermanent loss spikes, and Compound utilization rates swing wildly.
The counterparty risk landscape is also evolving. The UK Financial Conduct Authority published its final policy statement on cryptoassets and anti-money laundering compliance on October 24, signaling increased regulatory scrutiny. While DeFi protocols technically operate without intermediaries, the on-ramps and off-ramps that connect DeFi to traditional finance face growing compliance requirements.
Step-by-Step Execution
For yield farmers looking to position themselves ahead of the MCD launch, the strategy breaks into three phases. Phase one involves accumulating DAI and depositing it into existing yield vehicles — Compound lending pools offer the most liquid option with relatively predictable returns. Farmers should maintain a portion of their portfolio in ETH-denominated positions to benefit from any positive price momentum driven by macro catalysts like China’s blockchain push.
Phase two centers on preparation for the DSR launch. When Multi-Collateral DAI goes live, the DSR will offer a risk-free yield denominated in DAI, assuming the smart contract functions as designed. Early depositors into the DSR module will likely earn the highest rates before equilibrium kicks in and returns normalize. Monitoring MakerDAO governance forums and the official blog for the audit completion announcement is essential.
Phase three involves active liquidity provision on Uniswap. The protocol’s growth trajectory — documented in The Block’s Genesis Report for October 2019 — shows increasing trading volume, particularly in ETH-to-stablecoin pairs. Providing liquidity to these pools generates a share of trading fees proportional to the pool share, with the added benefit of building a position that becomes more valuable as DeFi adoption grows.
Final Thoughts
The DeFi yield farming landscape of October 2019 sits at a transitional moment. MakerDAO’s Multi-Collateral DAI represents the most significant protocol upgrade in the ecosystem’s short history, and the DSR mechanism it introduces will create a foundational yield instrument that all other DeFi rates will benchmark against. Meanwhile, external catalysts — from China’s blockchain endorsement to regulatory developments in Europe — add layers of both opportunity and uncertainty. Yield farmers who understand the smart contract risks and position themselves ahead of the MCD launch stand to capture outsized returns, but the market remains thin enough that patience and risk management matter more than raw speed.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. DeFi protocols carry smart contract risks, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research before participating in yield farming strategies.
the SAI to DAI migration was chaos. so many people didnt understand they had to manually upgrade their tokens. lost count of the support requests
the migration was rough but at least it happened. some projects never bother with proper upgrade paths and just launch a v2 token
the migration portal was so confusing. had to walk three people through it manually because they kept sending SAI to ERC20 addresses
$650M TVL feels like pocket change now. wild to think that was the entire DeFi ecosystem and people thought it was massive
Multi-collateral was MakerDAOs biggest bet. Having SAI backed only by ETH made the whole system fragile during the 2018 crash. Adding BAT and other collateral types was overdue.
yield farming on DSR was the original stablecoin yield play. rates were actually decent before everyone piled in
stablefarmer_ SAI to DAI migration was one of the smoothest upgrades in DeFi history. Maker governance actually worked
650 million total TVL in DeFi feels like a different planet compared to today. those were the innocent days
650M total TVL across all of DeFi and we thought that was massive. the multi-collateral upgrade was the inflection point
btc at 7493 and eth at 162. everyone farming stablecoin yields because directionals were dead. sound familiar?