Ethereum Classic (ETC)
7.92
39.92
-80.2%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, 50d rising, MACD+, RSI healthy (66.6), rising 1m & 3m, strong bull trend (ADX 45.0)
Bearish factors: death cross, far below high
Low: 6.02
Now: 7.92
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 66.6 | ADX (14) | 45.0 |
| 50d MA | 6.84 | 200d MA | 7.89 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 6.02 | Resistance | 9.04 |
| ATR Volatility | 4.67%/day | Trend | BUY |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| ETC | +22.1% | +12.8% | -7.0% | -35.9% |
| BTC | +25.6% | +35.1% | +6.5% | -8.4% |
| ETH | +32.8% | +61.5% | +7.5% | -15.2% |
| SOL | +47.8% | +58.7% | +24.4% | -15.0% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| ETC | -20.6% | -55.9% | -30.6% | 48 | 40% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (ETC)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -35.9% | 4,383 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -30.2% | 8,371 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -24.2% | 9,097 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -22.4% | 9,314 |
ETC Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 6.71 (-15.3%) |
| Target 1 | 9.00 (13.6%) |
| Target 2 | 9.00 (13.6%) |
| Entry quality | Extended (R:R 0.91) |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-05-22 | BUY | 8.78 | |
| 2026-05-23 | SELL | 8.99 | +2.5% |
| 2026-05-24 | BUY | 8.91 | |
| 2026-05-25 | SELL | 8.94 | +0.3% |
| 2026-07-26 | BUY | 7.09 | |
| 2026-07-27 | SELL | 6.79 | -4.2% |
| 2026-08-22 | BUY | 7.90 | |
| 2026-08-23 | SELL | 7.95 | +0.6% |
| 2026-08-24 | BUY | 7.75 | |
| 2026-08-25 | SELL | 7.66 | -1.1% |
| 2026-08-26 | BUY | 7.89 | |
| 2026-08-27 | SELL | 7.92 | +0.4% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
etc at 7.92 after an 80% drawdown and the system still calls it stage 2 uptrend. trend following is wild
death cross flagged bearish while ADX reads 45.0, one of these indicators is lying lol
^ right, ADX measures strength not direction. the buy call stands or dies on the 50d staying above the 200d
stage 2 right after an 80 percent drawdown is how every alt bottom has ever started tbh. by the time the chart looks clean you are paying 3x, seen it with etc in 2020 too
etc at 7.92 with a buy call and a 12k deployment plan, brave. the hashrate history alone would keep me at half size
the 51 percent attacks were years ago, let it go. original pow chain under 8 bucks is honestly a decent lottery ticket
original chain under 8 bucks is a story people buy, not a thesis. but the 2020 bottom buyers heard the same and did fine
bought the 2020 bottom on the same story and sold way too early. thats why tranche tables exist now, emotions are terrible execution engines
half size on a 7.92 lottery ticket still sounds generous given the attack history. respect the conviction tho
^ half size is still generous imo. ETC has zombie fundamentals, it pumps purely on BTC tailwinds
half size is generous, quarter size is honest. the 39.92 high sits 5x away and the attack history is exactly why it stays cheap
ADX 45 on ETC while the death cross still flashes bearish. when the trend indicators fight this hard the only honest play is the small tranche the article suggests
small tranche is the only sane answer when your indicators are fist fighting. one thing ETC always does is whatever BTC does at 3x amplitude
3x amplitude cuts both ways tho. btc sneezes down 5 percent and the whole first tranche is underwater
A 12k deployment on a chain with three 51 percent attacks in its history. The chart can look however it wants, the security budget is the thesis
three 51% attacks is the whole bear case and its years old. still, 7.92 with ADX 45, the tranche plan is the only structure that respects both sides
7.92 against a 39.92 high is an 80% discount with a real hashpower security debate attached. the tranche plan is the only sane way in
etc doing btc moves at 3x amplitude means a 23% btc week is a potential 60% etc week. thats the only stat that matters in this entire writeup
3x amplitude cuts both ways. a 20% btc dump and etc gives back the entire 60% week plus interest
3x amplitude is also 3x downside when btc rolls over. the tranche plan only works if you actually honor the lower fills instead of averaging up like everyone does
the tranche table does the heavy lifting in this thesis and always has. a price target without entry discipline is just a wishlist
nobody mentions the security budget anymore. etc hashrate shrinks every halving, the 51% attack history is not aging into irrelevance
the security budget point keeps getting copied between threads with no numbers attached. hashrate relative to price is the ratio that matters, and it has stabilized this year
12k staged across tranches on a chain that survived three 51 percent attacks. the math can work, the history is exactly why the entries are staged
7.92 with ADX 45 and the thread is still relitigating 2020 attacks. the tranche table is the only part of this piece that survives contact with reality
ADX 45 means the trend already ran by the time retail sees it. first tranche ends up chasing instead of accumulating, happens every time