We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept," you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
cash redemptions were always gonna be the bottleneck for the big allocators. in-kind means they take actual btc delivery, that is a structural change imo
There is also a tax angle here. In-kind redemption can defer the capital gains event that a cash redeem would trigger. The big family offices definitely pushed for this.
The tax deferral point is underrated. A cash redeem crystallizes gains on every rebalance, in-kind just moves the asset itself. Family offices clearly pushed for this.
the family office tax angle is exactly it. cash redemption forces a disposal event, in-kind just moves the asset. this feature was lobbied into existence
the disposal event point is underrated. every AP switching to in-kind is running a tax deferral machine, expect that minimum basket size to creep lower until advisors notice
Note it says large investors only. Retail is still stuck with cash redemption and the friction that comes with it. Two tiers, same fund.
in-kind redemption is huge for big funds, no taxable cash event on rebalancing. blackrock keeps out-iterating everyone
in-kind at the institutional tier also concentrates actual btc custody with the aps even more. deeper liquidity yes, but the tradeoffs cut both ways
the AP custody concentration point is the one nobody prices. scale in-kind up enough and you’re quietly rebuilding paper bitcoin inside the biggest fund on earth
exactly. coinbase already custodies most of IBIT, add AP level in-kind on top and you get one giant rehypothecation funnel wearing a bitcoin costume. people cheer this as bullish lol
the rehypothecation angle is overdone imo, each basket redemption is onchain verifiable at the AP level. whether anyone actually verifies is another thing
onchain verifiable only helps if someone actually audits it in real time. name one ap publishing basket proofs on a schedule
they wont publish proofs until a scandal forces it. etf land transparency is always retroactive, shipped after the failure not before
verifiable and verified are doing very different work in that sentence. the chain holds the proof, nobody has the mandate to check it
only for large investors tho. retail still stuck with cash creates and redemption spreads
retail cash redemption spreads basically subsidize a feature we cant even access. classic two tier fund
blackrock shipping in-kind while most competitors still fumble cash redemption spreads says everything. retail getting the crumbs again tho
IBIT quietly adding features while everyone argues about memecoins. this is how the endgame gets built, one boring clause at a time
one boring clause at a time until IBIT basically IS the market. people will still be arguing about memecoins when it happens
Would love to know if the SEC filing caps how much creation flow can go in-kind, or if it is uncapped for Authorized Participants. That detail decides how structural this actually is.
From the filing language floating around, in-kind is gated by a minimum basket size rather than a hard cap. So functionally uncapped for any AP moving real size, which answers your question mostly.
basket minimum is what, 10k shares? so yeah uncapped for anyone moving real size and gated for everyone else. same road, faster lane
same road faster lane is right. retail eats the cash spread while APs get frictionless btc delivery, two tier fund in one ticker
watch grayscale copy this within a quarter and call it innovation too lol
in-kind for size, cash spreads for retail, tax deferral for family offices. IBIT is quietly becoming a members club with a ticker attached