Thailand SEC Proposes 151,000 USD Daily Cap on Stablecoin Transfers to External Wallets

Thailand’s regulator moves to cap stablecoin transfers at five million baht per day

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed strict daily limits on stablecoin transfers between licensed digital asset platforms and external wallets, the latest in a series of measures aimed at tightening control over the country’s crypto on-ramps. Under the proposal published on Sept. 11, inbound and outbound stablecoin transfers involving private wallets or foreign operators would be capped at five million baht per customer, per operator, per day, roughly 151,000 USD at current exchange rates.

The consultation frames the caps as a response to money laundering, cybercrime and attempts to bypass controls governing international money transfers. Public comments remain open through Sept. 25, with the requirements proposed to take effect sixty days later. The rules are not yet in force, and the dollar equivalent of the cap will float with the Thai baht.

Verified ownership becomes the core requirement

The heart of the proposal is a same-name ownership rule. Licensed digital asset operators in Thailand could accept stablecoin deposits only from a wallet or account verified as belonging to their own customer. Withdrawals would likewise need to go to a destination wallet verified under the same customer’s name.

In practice, that would prohibit a customer from receiving stablecoins sent from another person’s wallet into their exchange account, or from withdrawing funds from a regulated operator directly to a third party’s wallet. Thai businesses would be required to establish procedures for verifying ownership before processing transfers, with checks operating alongside existing Travel Rule obligations.

Operators would also need to classify customers, screen account information, and check whether wallets are linked to mule accounts, watchlists or transactions carrying elevated illicit-finance risk. Blockchain analytics tools or comparable monitoring systems would become mandatory for tracing digital asset movements and identifying links to high-risk wallets, though the consultation does not prescribe a specific vendor or technical platform.

Exemptions carve out banks, businesses and market makers

Transfers between accounts held at Thai-regulated digital asset operators would escape the daily ceiling entirely, provided both businesses comply with the Travel Rule and customer information moves through the regulated system. Several other groups receive tailored exemptions under the framework.

Businesses transferring stablecoins through accounts held in their own names would not face the cap when the activity serves their stated commercial purpose. Institutions supervised by the Bank of Thailand could qualify when the central bank authorizes stablecoin use for a specific arrangement, assessed case by case. Market makers supplying liquidity to stablecoin-baht trading pairs would be exempted for transfers required for liquidity management, though the proposal stops short of a blanket waiver, leaving operators responsible for confirming each activity fits the stated function.

The permitted transfer value would also need to remain consistent with a customer’s income and financial position, meaning operators could apply a lower practical threshold when a transaction does not match information collected during onboarding checks.

Off-platform trades face minimums and price disclosure

Alongside the transfer caps, the Thai SEC proposed new standards for off-platform transactions handled by digital asset brokers and dealers. Such trades would require a minimum value of three million baht, approximately 91,000 USD, and businesses providing the service would need to publish digital asset trading prices on their websites so customers can verify pricing on transactions completed outside regular order books.

Brokers would be barred from arranging direct off-platform transactions between two customers, acting instead as agents that match clients through an exchange. The proposal draws a regulatory distinction between brokers, which arrange transactions for clients, and dealers, which trade as principals, with both categories subject to controls designed to prevent off-platform services from becoming channels for money laundering or cybercrime proceeds. The regulator did not publish data on how many existing transactions would fall below the proposed minimum.

Market makers face transparency rules

Licensed exchanges would be required to publish the names of their market makers and identify which digital assets each firm supplies liquidity for. Screening would cover the source of assets and the actual purpose of market-making transactions, with operators expected to monitor and periodically review market-maker conduct.

For brokers, the proposal prohibits liquidity providers from serving stablecoin-baht trading activity altogether. Qualifying providers elsewhere would face location, regulatory and anti-money-laundering requirements: no operation from jurisdictions that fail to implement Financial Action Task Force recommendations, oversight from an appropriate regulator, and reasonable grounds for the broker to believe customer assets can be safeguarded. Brokers would need to disclose their liquidity providers and any conflicts of interest, and source exchanges used by brokers would face comparable supervision standards.

Another brick in Thailand’s tightening wall

The stablecoin consultation follows earlier Thai moves toward expanded Travel Rule enforcement, including a proposal for five-year recordkeeping and wallet verification requirements. For context, Bitcoin traded near 77,200 USD and Ethereum near 2,525 USD in Sunday trading, with the broader crypto Fear and Greed Index at 63.

For retail users in Thailand, the combined effect of the proposals is a regulated perimeter that grows harder to leave: transfers capped, destinations verified, analytics attached, and off-platform alternatives pushed above a threshold most individuals cannot reach. Whether the Sept. 25 comment window produces material amendments remains to be seen, but the direction of travel is clear, and regional regulators watching Thailand’s experiment are likely to borrow from its template if it holds.