Flare (FLR)
0.01
0.04
-81.9%
Stage 3 (Topping)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, 50d rising, strong bull trend (ADX 28.4), accumulation (OBV up, vol ratio 1.25)
Bearish factors: price < 200d, death cross, MACD-, far below high
Low: 0.01
Now: 0.01
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 47.1 | ADX (14) | 28.4 |
| 50d MA | 0.01 | 200d MA | 0.01 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.01 | Resistance | 0.01 |
| ATR Volatility | 3.63%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| FLR | -4.3% | +13.8% | -3.1% | -29.3% |
| BTC | -3.2% | +31.3% | +30.8% | +14.3% |
| ETH | -8.6% | +33.7% | +42.1% | +17.3% |
| SOL | -9.3% | +41.1% | +56.4% | +16.8% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 35,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| FLR | -13.6% | -61.5% | -28.4% | 54 | 46% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (FLR)
If you had deployed 35,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -29.3% | 12,497 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -28.8% | 24,933 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -23.5% | 26,790 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -22.0% | 27,312 |
FLR Deployment Plan — 35,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Oliver Schmidt (Conservative / Institutional). If you’re managing a 35,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 5,250 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.01 (-7.3%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 10 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Conservative / Institutional.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-09-29 | BUY | 0.01 | |
| 2026-09-30 | SELL | 0.01 | -2.2% |
| 2026-10-01 | BUY | 0.01 | |
| 2026-10-02 | SELL | 0.01 | -2.5% |
| 2026-10-03 | BUY | 0.01 | |
| 2026-10-04 | SELL | 0.01 | +1.6% |
| 2026-10-05 | BUY | 0.01 | |
| 2026-10-06 | SELL | 0.01 | +0.6% |
| 2026-10-07 | BUY | 0.01 | |
| 2026-10-08 | SELL | 0.01 | -2.5% |
| 2026-10-09 | BUY | 0.01 | |
| 2026-10-10 | SELL | 0.01 | -0.9% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
price at 0.01 with a 52 week high of 0.04 and the call is HOLD? thats a 75 percent drawdown, call it what it is
flare at these levels is basically a lottery ticket on FAssets actually shipping. hold if you can stomach it i guess
a HOLD isnt a buy call, nobody is telling you to add at 0.01. it means dont puke the bag before FAssets volumes actually show up, that part is the whole thesis here
it is a 75 percent drawdown AND a hold, both can be true. the framework is about not capitulating at cycle lows, not about pretending the chart is pretty
its a hold precisely because its down 75, selling at cycle lows is how you turn a bad position into a permanent loss
75 percent drawdown and a hold can coexist, the rating is about not capitulating at the bottom. fassets inflows are the line worth watching
its down 75 because it round tripped an airdrop, the framework never said hold through the top. both things can be true
fair, but a hold that only earns trust after a 75 percent drawdown is a tough sell to anyone who bought the 0.04 top. fassets volumes are doing all the redemption work here
hold verdict with a staged 35k deployment feels fair. flare keeps printing higher lows on the 3 month chart even with the 1 year at -29%
the RSI over 82 exit filter is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that backtest, strip it and returns probably halve. still a hold tho
strip the rsi filter and most backtests die, that is not unique to flare. but agreed on the verdict, adding down here is just hoping FAssets volumes bail you out
every flaunted backtest leans on its exit filter, that is a backtesting problem, a flare problem. the hold verdict still lands though
every backtest has one load bearing filter, the honest ones name it in the text. verdict still lands at 0.01
three month higher lows while fassets volumes grind up is the quiet bull case. the one year chart is just where the last cycle ended
higher lows on the 3 month plus xrp ledger inflows actually showing up, first time flare has a use case line that moves. hold earns itself here
FAssets volumes are the only line that matters for flare. the xrp ledger inflows finally gave it a real use case, if that keeps climbing the 0.04 high is reachable again
0.04 again needs flare side volume not just xrp ledger inflows though. the connector side is where this thesis actually gets tested
agreed, connector volume is the actual tell. xrp ledger inflows without flare side activity is just borrowed optimism at 0.01
fassets on xrp ledger is doing numbers but the flare side still needs to catch up. at 0.01 the position is patience or nothing
staged deployment at 0.01 means the first tranche is basically a pilot, this is the least aggressive hold ive ever seen framed as controversial
0.01 flare with real xrp ledger inflows through fassets is a different asset than the airdrop bag everyone dumped in 2024. hold is the right call
35k into a token at 0.01 is 3.5 million flare. good luck with the exit slippage if fassets ever actually delivers
3.5 million flare is like 35k dollars at current depth lol, slippage on that is a tuesday for any market maker
hold with staged tranches is the only defensible rating after a 75 percent round trip. the 3 month higher lows at least argue nobody is capitulating here
staged tranches only work if you kept dry powder for 0.008. half the people reading a HOLD rating on flare will just sit on a full bag from 0.03 and call it a plan