📈 Get daily crypto insights that make you smarter about your money

One Point Six Billion in Crypto Is Just Sitting There Doing Nothing and Researchers Say It Is Costing Investors 150 Million a Year

More than one and a half billion dollars deposited in decentralized finance liquidity pools is effectively sitting idle, earning nothing, while the people who put it there are missing out on an estimated 150 million dollars in annual fees, according to new research from analytics firm Dune.

By Diego Rivera | July 18, 2026

The Hidden Problem in Your Liquidity Pool

If you have ever deposited tokens into a liquidity pool on Uniswap, PancakeSwap, or Aerodrome, you might assume your money is out there working hard, earning trading fees around the clock. New research suggests there is a good chance it is not.

Dune, commissioned by the decentralized exchange aggregator 1inch, tracked 1.84 billion dollars across concentrated liquidity pools on the three major DEXs over the first half of 2026. They found that 85% of that liquidity was underutilized, meaning it was not actively being used to facilitate trades and generate fees. Roughly 542 million dollars per week, about 30% of the total, sat completely out of range, priced in a way that traders could not use it at all.

The study covered Uniswap version 3 and version 4, PancakeSwap version 3, and Aerodrome Slipstream across seven blockchains, using weekly snapshots from January 6 through June 30.

How Concentrated Liquidity Works, and Why It Fails

Concentrated liquidity is one of the most powerful innovations in decentralized finance. Instead of spreading your money across every possible price, as older versions of Uniswap did, you choose a specific price range where you want to provide liquidity. While the market stays inside your range, your capital supports more trading and collects more fees. The moment the price moves outside your range, your position stops working entirely.

Think of it like a fishing net. You set it in the spot where you think the fish are swimming. If the fish move to a different part of the river, your net catches nothing until you pick it up and move it. The problem is that moving your net costs money in transaction fees, and you might move it to the wrong spot.

For example, if you provide liquidity to an ETH/USDC pool with a range between 2,000 and 2,500 dollars, your position earns fees only while Ethereum trades inside that band. If ETH drops to 1,800 or jumps to 2,700, your capital sits frozen until the price returns or you pay to adjust your range.

Small Investors Hit the Hardest

One of the most striking findings is how unevenly this problem affects different types of investors. Positions worth less than 1,000 dollars had 54% of their liquidity out of range on average, compared with just 26% for positions above 1 million dollars. Yet despite that better ratio, the large positions still accounted for 47% of all idle capital, or about 260 million dollars, simply because they are so much bigger.

The researchers also found that individual wallets, meaning regular people managing their own positions manually, accounted for between 82% and 94% of all attributed idle capital on Uniswap version 3, depending on the chain. That makes sense: if you are a small investor with a day job, you probably are not watching your liquidity ranges every hour and adjusting them when the price drifts.

  • Total tracked liquidity: 1.84 billion dollars across major DEXs
  • Underutilized: 85%, or roughly 1.6 billion dollars
  • Completely out of range: 542 million dollars per week average
  • Missed fees estimate: approximately 150 million dollars annually
  • Small positions out of range: 54% for positions under 1,000 dollars
  • Large positions out of range: 26% for positions over 1 million dollars

What This Means for DeFi’s Next Chapter

The findings arrive at a pivotal moment for decentralized finance. Retail platforms like Robinhood are racing to bring millions of new casual investors onchain, and traditional financial firms are rapidly expanding their work on tokenized funds and blockchain-based settlement. As more capital flows into DeFi, the cost of idle liquidity will only grow.

Filippo Armani, research lead at Dune, put it plainly: “Decentralized exchanges have grown into one of the deepest, most liquid markets in crypto. What our research shows is that it has reached this scale even though much of its liquidity is not yet fully at work.”

1inch, which commissioned the research, has a clear interest in highlighting this problem. The company is preparing to launch Aqua, a new liquidity protocol designed to let multiple DeFi strategies share the same capital, which could theoretically reduce the idle liquidity problem. Dune said it developed the methodology independently.

The Verdict: Active Management Pays, but It Is Not Free

If you are providing concentrated liquidity on Uniswap, PancakeSwap, or Aerodrome, the takeaway is simple: check your ranges. The research estimates that out-of-range positions are missing roughly 150 million dollars in annual fees based on a blended in-range fee annual percentage rate of about 35%. That is real money being left on the table.

But the study also cautions that this is not guaranteed recoverable income. Keeping positions active involves transaction costs every time you adjust a range, execution risk when you move capital, and exposure to unfavorable price movements. For small investors especially, the gas fees from constantly rebalancing could eat into whatever additional fees you might earn.

The bigger picture is that DeFi has a plumbing problem. The system works, but it is leaky. As the space grows and attracts more institutional capital, expect to see more protocols and automated tools designed to solve the idle liquidity problem. Until then, the best thing you can do is pay attention to where your money is sitting.

The cryptocurrency market remains highly volatile. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry risk; always do your own research.

🌱 FOR BUSINESSES BitcoinsNews.com
Reach 100K+ Crypto Readers
Sponsored content, press releases, banner ads, and newsletter placements. Put your brand in front of Bitcoin's most engaged audience.

17 thoughts on “One Point Six Billion in Crypto Is Just Sitting There Doing Nothing and Researchers Say It Is Costing Investors 150 Million a Year”

  1. small positions 54% out of range vs big ones at 26%. basically confirms what everyone knows: whales use bots and retail sets it and forgets it

    1. @cl_factor_ the gas fees to rebalance on ethereum mainnet will eat you alive if your position is under 1k. its not laziness its economics

  2. 85% of liquidity sitting idle while people wonder why their LP returns suck. been saying concentrated liquidity is a part time job

  3. 542M per week completely out of range. thats not inefficiency thats just people forgetting they have positions lol

    1. range_bot_ops

      ^ this is why auto compounders and range managers exist. if youre manually rebalancing on uniswap v3 youre losing money to gas fees every time

      1. gelato_user_99

        @range_bot_ops auto compounders take 10 to 20 percent of your yield as fees. between that and gas youre basically paying someone else to not be lazy for you

        1. gelato_user_99 auto compounders charging 10-20% of yield is wild. you are literally paying someone to press rebalance for you. learn to script or stick to v2 pools

          1. fee_leak_ auto compounders charging 20% of yield is highway robbery when the rebalancing is a 5 line smart contract. the real problem is gas costs make manual rebalancing uneconomical for small LPs

  4. 1inch commissioned this study and is launching Aqua to fix the exact problem they identified. cool research but come on, the incentives are obvious

    1. @aqua_skep_ 1inch commissioning research that proves their new product is needed is the oldest play in crypto. that said the 85% idle number is embarrassing for the whole sector not just 1inch

      1. range_pirate_

        Pavel D. 1inch funding research that proves their product is needed is standard corporate strategy. doesnt mean the 85% number is wrong though. idle LP capital is a real problem

  5. 1inch funding research that conveniently proves their new product Aqua is needed. not saying the data is wrong but come on, read the room

  6. v3_liquidator

    150M in missed fees annually and people still insist concentrated liquidity is passive income. its a part time job with worse hours

    1. v3_liquidator calling concentrated liquidity passive income is the biggest lie in DeFi. its a part time job and most people are bad at it

      1. pool_misallocator_

        Rasmus E. concentrated liquidity being a part time job is exactly why v2 pools still have more TVL than v3 on most chains. simplicity wins over efficiency for retail users

  7. 1.84B tracked and 85% sitting idle. thats 1.56B in capital earning zero fees. traditional fund managers would be fired for this level of capital inefficiency

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BTC$64,688.00+0.5%ETH$1,912.78+2.1%SOL$75.35+1.0%BNB$572.75+0.8%XRP$1.10-0.1%ADA$0.1646-0.7%DOGE$0.0727+0.0%DOT$0.8187+0.2%AVAX$6.67-0.1%LINK$8.58+2.0%UNI$3.90+6.0%ATOM$1.39+0.3%LTC$47.84+3.4%ARB$0.0824-0.9%NEAR$1.79-0.5%FIL$0.7434+2.2%SUI$0.7121-0.3%BTC$64,688.00+0.5%ETH$1,912.78+2.1%SOL$75.35+1.0%BNB$572.75+0.8%XRP$1.10-0.1%ADA$0.1646-0.7%DOGE$0.0727+0.0%DOT$0.8187+0.2%AVAX$6.67-0.1%LINK$8.58+2.0%UNI$3.90+6.0%ATOM$1.39+0.3%LTC$47.84+3.4%ARB$0.0824-0.9%NEAR$1.79-0.5%FIL$0.7434+2.2%SUI$0.7121-0.3%
Scroll to Top