Ethena (ENA)
0.09
1.33
-93.5%
Stage 3 (Topping)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, MACD+, RSI healthy (52.6)
Bearish factors: price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, far below high, distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.75)
Low: 0.07
Now: 0.09
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 52.6 | ADX (14) | 18.3 |
| 50d MA | 0.08 | 200d MA | 0.11 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.07 | Resistance | 0.09 |
| ATR Volatility | 6.19%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| ENA | +12.9% | -11.5% | -16.8% | -68.0% |
| BTC | -0.0% | -16.6% | -9.5% | -30.8% |
| ETH | +6.6% | -9.0% | -11.8% | -37.6% |
| SOL | -9.1% | -12.3% | -17.5% | -46.4% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 35,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| ENA | +28.4% | -81.0% | -24.3% | 16 | 62% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (ENA)
If you had deployed 35,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -68.0% | 5,262 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -59.1% | 14,302 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -52.1% | 16,755 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -47.9% | 18,249 |
ENA Deployment Plan — 35,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Oliver Schmidt (Conservative / Institutional). If you’re managing a 35,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 5,250 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.08 (-12.4%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 10 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Conservative / Institutional.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2025-07-29 | BUY | 0.57 | |
| 2025-07-30 | SELL | 0.60 | +6.1% |
| 2025-07-31 | BUY | 0.57 | |
| 2025-08-01 | SELL | 0.58 | +1.7% |
| 2025-08-02 | BUY | 0.52 | |
| 2025-08-03 | SELL | 0.59 | +14.0% |
| 2025-08-04 | BUY | 0.60 | |
| 2025-08-05 | SELL | 0.58 | -3.9% |
| 2025-08-06 | BUY | 0.60 | |
| 2025-08-07 | SELL | 0.64 | +6.0% |
| 2025-08-08 | BUY | 0.64 | |
| 2025-09-19 | SELL | 0.67 | +4.5% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
HOLD at -93.5% from the high? thats not a hold, thats a prayer. anyone still bag holding ENA from $1.30 is in deep copium territory
Marek its down 93% but USDe TVL is still like 5b+. the protocol works, token is just disconnected from actual revenue. classic
Yumi N. protocol works but token at -93% means the market says the token is worthless. TVL doesnt matter if holders get nothing
disconnected is generous. the sats yield flows to USDe holders and ENA captures none of it by design. the protocol prints, the token watches
death cross + OBV trending down + 0.75 vol ratio. yeah this is a distribution pattern not a hold. anyone buying here is catching a falling knife
sats_or_die_ the OBV trending down for months and they still publish HOLD. who is this analysis for, people who enjoy losing money
death cross on a token already down 93%. whats it crossing, the floor of hades
liv_meridian_ floor of hades is generous. at -93% the death cross is crossing the basement floor of the subbasement. anyone who bought ENA above a dollar and is still holding needs a support group not a deployment plan.
support group not a deployment plan, stealing this for my group chat lol
down 93% and they slap a HOLD rating on it. analyst reports are just copium with a pdf cover
Yasin T. the TVL argument is so tired. 5b in TVL means nothing if token holders get zero revenue share. its a charity at this point
5b TVL and zero of it reaches the token. at some point that’s just a charity with a chart attached
charity with a chart is brutal and accurate. USDe yielders eat fine, ENA holders fund the chart
usde apy still prints while ena bleeds, the incentive design works perfectly for everyone except the token holder. charity with a chart is the correct file name
A HOLD at -93% is a shrug with a disclaimer. The 35,000 deployment plan is the only number in the whole report you can actually verify later.
Danijel M. the 35K deployment plan surviving a 93% drawdown means the DCA math is the only useful part of the entire report. the HOLD rating is noise, the buy table is the signal.
the buy table is the only line worth reading and even that assumes you still trust the desk after a year of auto renewed HOLDs on a -93% token
the buy table is the only line worth reading and even that assumes you still trust the desk after a year of auto renewed HOLDs on a -93% token
Danijel M. disagree slightly, the deployment table is verifiable which makes it the only falsifiable line in the report. ratings are vibes, buy levels are commitments
HOLD is what the template auto-renews when the analyst stopped covering months ago. -93.5% with a death cross deserves a creative downgrade at least
rating_inertia creative downgrade lol. honestly a -93.5 percent token with a death cross and the template still prints HOLD, someone should audit how these ratings get generated
the funniest part is the drawdown box and the rating box sit on the same page and never talk to each other. -93.5 pct and HOLD shook hands
four pages on funding rates and one paragraph on what happens if the basis trade flips negative. the actual risk lives in that paragraph
Stage 3 top formation printed right in the report header and the rating still says HOLD. even the dashboard gave up before the analyst did
death cross on the weekly and the plan is buy 0.09. even the conviction column reads like it was copied from last quarters hold