Jupiter (JUP)
0.00
0.56
-99.9%
Stage 3 (Topping)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, RSI healthy (52.0), rising 1m & 3m
Bearish factors: price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, far below high, strong bear trend (ADX 88.1), vol 18.9x on down day
Low: 0.00
Now: 0.00
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 52.0 | ADX (14) | 88.1 |
| 50d MA | 0.00 | 200d MA | 0.00 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.00 | Resistance | 0.00 |
| ATR Volatility | 68.78%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| JUP | +4.4% | +3.5% | +12.0% | -56.1% |
| BTC | -0.0% | -16.6% | -9.5% | -30.8% |
| ETH | +6.6% | -9.0% | -11.8% | -37.6% |
| SOL | -9.1% | -12.3% | -17.5% | -46.4% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 10,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| JUP | -100.0% | -86.6% | -100.0% | 50 | 28% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (JUP)
If you had deployed 10,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -56.1% | 2,538 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -51.4% | 4,861 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -42.0% | 5,798 |
| DCA — 12 buys | +34.7% | 13,467 |
JUP Deployment Plan — 10,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Aisha Okonkwo (Yield / Staking Focused). If you’re managing a 10,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 2,500 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | -0.00 (-119.3%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Yield / Staking Focused.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-01-14 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-01-15 | SELL | 0.00 | -4.1% |
| 2026-01-16 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-01-17 | SELL | 0.00 | +0.8% |
| 2026-01-18 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-01-19 | SELL | 0.00 | -7.7% |
| 2026-07-14 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-07-15 | SELL | 0.00 | +4.7% |
| 2026-07-16 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-07-17 | SELL | 0.00 | -3.5% |
| 2026-07-18 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-07-19 | SELL | 0.00 | -95.7% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
JUP at current price with 52W high of 0.56 is rough. the DEX volume on Solana is strong but token value capture is basically zero
dex_yield_ exactly. JUP processes billions in DEX volume but token holders get nothing. the fee switch debate has been going on since launch
-99.9% drawdown and they still rate it a HOLD? at that point just call it what it is, dead money
lmao right, 52w high was 0.56 and now its showing 0.00. who is holding this bag
ADX of 88.1 on the bear trend is brutal. that kinda momentum doesnt just flip overnight, anyone buying here is fighting a freight train
10k deployment plan at these levels feels aggressive for a utility token with minimal buyback mechanism. dilution from team unlocks will crush any rally
Minseo P. the unlock schedule is the killer. JUP has been a slow bleed for months and HOLD rating ignores that entirely
ADX of 88 on the bear trend and they still slap a HOLD on it. -99.9% drawdown isnt a dip its a death spiral
solflake_ the HOLD rating makes sense if youre already bagholding. cutting losses at -99.9% vs holding for a 0.1% bounce is the same thing
at -99.9% the position is basically a call option that never expires. selling it to feel disciplined is paying fees for a psychology win
a call option that never expires also never pays out. at least real options have a theta schedule you can plan around, this is just decay with extra steps
JUP DEX volume on Solana is massive but token value capture is the issue. Solana DEXes could do 100B volume and JUP holders would still get crumbs
HOLD on a -99.9% drawdown is wild. at least with a SELL you can harvest the loss for tax purposes
depends on jurisdiction, harvesting only helps if you have gains to offset. if jup is your only bag the tax angle is cope, its a 10 dollar decision either way
a 10 dollar bag minus the fees to sell it. at some point hold is just the default because pressing the button costs more than the position
the fee-to-sell math on a 10 dollar bag is dark comedy. the exchange is the only one who wins on this exit
the dark comedy deepens once you realize the LP position pays fees both ways too. holding JUP is negative carry plus a governance vote you will lose
the governance point is the quiet killer here. even if the fee switch ever passes, JUP holders are voting on terms written by the team that owns the routing
team writes the terms, team owns the routing, holders vote on their own leash. and the fee switch will conveniently land the same quarter as the next airdrop
true, harvesting a 10k deployment loss only matters if you have gains somewhere else. most JUP holders have exactly one bag
JUP still routes real volume on Solana, the token just captures none of it. holding at this point is mostly airdrop nostalgia
nostalgia is exactly the word. everyone still holding is waiting for the next airdrop to make the exit free, which is a hell of a thesis for a routing protocol
a 10k deployment plan into a token that roundtrips to 10 dollars is the funniest thing published this week. the HOLD rating is doing hostage diplomacy
ADX of 88 and the fee switch still undecided since launch. the token routes nothing to holders and the chart agrees
HOLD rating on a bag that roundtripped to 10 dollars is the analyst equivalent of a participation trophy