We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic. By clicking "Accept," you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
insurance funds that actually pay out on flash loan disasters, novel concept in defi i know
premiums quoted per protocol, payouts at the parameters discretion. read any coverage doc and the exclusion list is longer than the coverage list
protocol owned insurance is just a treasury with extra steps until someone stress tests an actual payout. show me one real claim paid during a cascade
The flash loan coverage is the interesting part. If payouts actually trigger on manipulated oracle readings that would be genuinely new for DeFi.
The oracle manipulation part is where it gets murky. If the param only pays on idiosyncratic exploits and calls a manipulated reading a market event, the coverage is decorative.
decorative coverage is the right phrase. if a flash loan warped the oracle and the param calls it a market event, you paid premiums for nothing
decorative is generous, some coverage docs literally define oracle manipulation out of scope. you pay for the one exploit type that never triggers
real question. a few coverage protocols paid out on isolated exploits, but a correlated cascade hitting five books at once is completely untested
exactly, sherwood paid euler because one book blew up alone. the whole model breaks the day five protocols share the same collateral cascade
sherwood also had humans with signing keys making the euler call. these new pools settle at the discretion of a token vote, thats the part nobody wants to stress test
one counterexample, sherwood actually paid out on the euler exploit in 23. a correlated cascade hitting five books at once is the open question tho
sherwood paying euler is the exception that keeps hope alive, but that was one book, one chain. a correlated cascade across l2s is where every model just shrugs
one payout on one isolated exploit is a press release. five protocols blowing up in the same week is the exam nobody has taken
this. premiums quoted per protocol mean nothing until a cascade forces simultaneous payouts and the pool comes up short. thats the real stress test
protocol insurance is great until the insurance fund itself gets drained. seen that movie twice already
nexus style pools at least sit outside the protocol treasury so the drain scenario is harder to pull off. but yeah nobody has actually paid out on a correlated cascade, that part is still faith based
insurance priced off past exploits in a market where every exploit is novel. the actuarial side of defi is still basically astrology
premiums priced off historical exploits is the quiet problem. the models assume one book blows up at a time and correlated collateral says hi
correlated collateral is the whole issue. every model backtests against single incidents because that is all the data they have
one incident per decade of data is right, and its why every param pool quietly caps correlated exposure in the fine print. the backtest is theater, the exclusions do the real work
underwriting by fine print. first cascade fills the discords with denied claim screenshots and the premium machine stops overnight
flash loan coverage triggering on manipulated oracle readings would be the first genuinely new product here. until then its a treasury with a marketing deck
a treasury with a marketing deck is exactly it. first real cascade and the payout language will read market event in bold
that phrase is doing so much work. market event covers basically every failure mode defi actually has, which is the entire grift
premiums on correlated collateral books should price like hurricane insurance. instead every param pool quotes like sunny day odds