Falcon USD (USDF)
2.14
2.52
-14.9%
Stage 3 (Topping)
Bullish factors: RSI healthy (55.7)
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, vol 20.0x on down day
Low: 1.24
Now: 2.14
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 55.7 | ADX (14) | 10.3 |
| 50d MA | 2.14 | 200d MA | 2.14 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 2.14 | Resistance | 2.14 |
| ATR Volatility | 0.0%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| USDF | +0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% |
| BTC | +21.2% | +23.9% | +2.8% | -10.4% |
| ETH | +29.1% | +39.9% | +9.7% | -16.6% |
| SOL | +33.4% | +27.4% | +23.8% | -17.4% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 30,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| USDF | +0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (USDF)
If you had deployed 30,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | +0.0% | 30,000 |
| DCA — 4 buys | +0.0% | 30,000 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -0.0% | 30,000 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -0.0% | 30,000 |
USDF Deployment Plan — 30,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Marcus Reid (Long-term HODLer). If you’re managing a 30,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 4,500 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 2.14 (0.0%) |
| Target 1 | 2.00 (-6.6%) |
| Target 2 | 2.00 (-6.6%) |
| Entry quality | Unknown (R:R None) |
| Max concurrent positions | 8 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Long-term HODLer.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
ADX at 10.3 says everything. USDF just flatlining at 2.14 while ETH rips 39.9% in 3 months. HOLD is generous, this is dead money in a trending market.
@stablewatch_owl dead money is exactly the phrase. ATR of 0.0% per day means the backtest never even triggers the buy condition. You are literally holding for nothing.
adx 10.3 and atr 0.0% a day, this chart is clinically dead. calling it HOLD is generous tbh
^ exactly. 1 bull factor vs 5 bear and the verdict is still WAIT, the system basically shrugged
clinically dead is generous, its in a jar of formaldehyde. 30k parked at 2.14 while ETH prints 39.9% a quarter, brutal allocation
the formaldehyde jar line is sending me. but honestly a 0.0% ATR beats a -40% one, parking 30k in USDF for a few weeks is just a weird way of holding cash
except actual cash pays interest. 30k in USDF at 0.0% ATR is cash with extra steps plus redemption risk tacked on
this. 30k in usdf at zero atr needs a yield number to justify itself and the piece never gives one. redemption risk for free is a worse checking account
The -14.9% drawdown from that 2.52 high is the part nobody mentions about these quasi-stable tokens. They call it stability, I call it a slow bleed with extra steps.
the -14.9% off that 2.52 high is the stat of the whole piece. quasi-stable until it isnt, then the peg is a memory
Support 2.14, resistance 2.14, both MAs at 2.14. That single line tells you more than the whole writeup.
support 2.14, resistance 2.14, both MAs at 2.14. you could chart this thing with one straightedge lol
one straightedge lmao, add ADX at 10.3 and you have the entire chart described in two numbers
one straightedge comment wins the thread, sadly true. both MAs pinned at 2.14 while everything else moves on without it
1 bull factor against 5 bear and the call is still HOLD? Marcus Reid braver than me. I would want to see at least a reclaim of the 50d before touching a Stage 3 topping pattern.
The 50d reclaim point is fair but with ATR at literally 0.0% you would wait weeks for that to print. I rotated my tranche to ETH after reading this, honestly.
the HOLD makes sense when the alternative is waiting for a 50d reclaim on a 0.0% ATR chart. there is literally no entry signal to take
1 bull against 5 bear and HOLD is the honest output. forcing a WAIT would just dress up a flatline with false urgency
a 30k deployment plan for a token that literally cannot move is the most Marcus Reid thing ever. the plan is fine, the subject is a savings account
30k parked in a token moving 0.0% a day while ETH did 39.9% in a quarter. the opportunity cost alone turns that HOLD into a sell for me
Marcus Reid writing a 30k deployment plan for a token whose backtest logged zero trades. the analysis is fine, the instrument is the problem
@Kwame Aidoo zero trades in the backtest is actually the point though, no signal means no bad signal. but yeah 2.14 forever is its own kind of risk
Fair point on no signal beating bad signal. But three straight months of nothing on a 2.14 peg is itself the signal, rotate and revisit when ATR wakes up
the instrument is the whole problem, reid even prints the 0.0% atr himself. a deployment plan for a token with no variance is a plan to do nothing politely
respect the framework but a Stage 3 topping pattern that never resolves either way is just a savings account with a chart attached. Reid held the line, i wouldnt
zero trades in the backtest and Reid still wrote 1200 words. dedication lol. hold is right but hold means holding nothing imo
1200 words on zero trades is the deep analysis genre in a nutshell. but id rather read that than forced conviction on a flatline