LEO Token (LEO)
8.89
10.39
-14.4%
Stage 4 (Downtrend)
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, MACD-, RSI weak (36.4), falling 1m & 3m, strong bear trend (ADX 46.4), distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.3)
Low: 5.51
Now: 8.89
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 36.4 | ADX (14) | 46.4 |
| 50d MA | 9.37 | 200d MA | 9.66 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 8.72 | Resistance | 9.72 |
| ATR Volatility | 1.9%/day | Trend | SELL |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| LEO | -5.7% | -9.3% | -11.8% | -1.7% |
| BTC | +0.0% | +21.8% | -5.2% | -13.9% |
| ETH | +2.1% | +35.5% | +5.3% | -19.1% |
| SOL | +1.5% | +41.0% | +9.7% | -22.1% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 15,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| LEO | -30.0% | +0.2% | -30.7% | 53 | 40% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (LEO)
If you had deployed 15,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -1.7% | 14,012 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -1.3% | 14,805 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -6.4% | 14,043 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -2.5% | 14,625 |
LEO Deployment Plan — 15,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Tomas Novak (Momentum / Swing Trader). If you’re managing a 15,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,750 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 8.55 (-3.8%) |
| Target 1 | 9.00 (1.3%) |
| Target 2 | 10.00 (12.5%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Momentum / Swing Trader.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-03-28 | BUY | 9.59 | |
| 2026-03-29 | SELL | 9.66 | +0.7% |
| 2026-04-24 | BUY | 10.25 | |
| 2026-05-10 | SELL | 10.08 | -1.7% |
| 2026-05-14 | BUY | 10.19 | |
| 2026-05-16 | SELL | 9.94 | -2.5% |
| 2026-07-25 | BUY | 9.71 | |
| 2026-08-11 | SELL | 9.41 | -3.0% |
| 2026-08-29 | BUY | 9.68 | |
| 2026-08-30 | SELL | 9.61 | -0.7% |
| 2026-08-31 | BUY | 9.61 | |
| 2026-09-01 | SELL | 9.39 | -2.3% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
0 bull vs 9 bear factors, RSI 36.4, price 8.89 below both the 9.37 and 9.66 moving averages. AVOID is obvious. What confuses me is the plan showing targets at 9.00 and 10.00 with a stop at 8.55. Why hedge a SELL signal?
those targets are probably there because the template demands a deployment plan even on AVOID. agreed it reads weird next to a 0/9 scorecard
Joanna has a point on the 9.00 and 10.00 targets with a stop at 8.55. LEO at 8.89 is barely above that stop, so one thin order book wick and the SELL plan validates itself
LEO is a weird one for trend systems. Only -1.7% on the year while BTC did -13.9%, because the exchange keeps buying back supply. With 1.9% daily ATR you get 53 trades and a 40% win rate grinding down to -30%.
Buyback pressure is exactly why momentum lags here, the float quietly shrinks so signals fire late. Either way there is no case for deploying into a Stage 4 downtrend.
buyback point is underrated. running a trend system on a token with shrinking float is forcing it, the -30% backtest proves it
0 bull vs 9 bear factors is brutal. not often you see a scorecard that lopsided, props for not hedging on this one
ADX 46 with price under both MAs, that trend is real not noise. Anyone buying this dip is fighting the tape. Support at 8.72 is the line to watch.
down only 1.7% on the year while btc is down 13.9%, honestly could be worse for a hold. still not touching it tho lol
LEO is an exchange token, half these trend signals get distorted by thin order books. Would want volume data before trusting a SELL here.