📈 Get daily crypto insights that make you smarter about your money

South Korea’s Crypto Exchanges Lost 78 Percent of Their Profits in Six Months — KoFIU Data Shows Where the Money Went

South Korea — one of the world’s most passionate crypto-trading nations — just posted its worst exchange numbers in years. Government data released Thursday by the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU) shows operating profits at domestic virtual asset exchanges collapsed 78 percent in the first half of 2026, as trading activity, market valuations and customer deposits all shrank at once. For anyone who owns crypto, this isn’t just Korean bookkeeping: when one of Asia’s biggest retail markets goes quiet, it removes a source of global buying power — and it says a lot about where everyday investors are putting their money instead.

By Yasmin Al-Rashid | October 4, 2026

The Hook: A Retail Powerhouse Hits the Brakes

If you’ve followed crypto for any length of time, you know the “Kimchi premium” — the famous pattern of South Korean retail traders bidding prices higher than the rest of the world. That enthusiasm is what made Korea a bellwether for global risk appetite. So when KoFIU, the government’s financial-crime and AML watchdog, reports that exchange operating profits fell more than three-quarters in six months, it’s worth understanding what actually broke. Spoiler: nothing exploded. Money simply moved somewhere else — and that somewhere is the traditional stock market.

On-Chain Evidence: Every Major Metric Fell Together

The KoFIU survey, published Thursday, covered 26 registered virtual asset service providers — 17 exchange operators plus nine custody and wallet providers — and tracked activity from January 1 through June 30, 2026. The damage was broad and consistent:

  • Average daily trading volume at domestic exchanges fell 44 percent from the previous six months
  • Market capitalization of traded assets dropped 33 percent
  • Won-denominated customer deposits declined 35 percent
  • Exchange sales revenue fell 41 percent
  • The number of eligible trading accounts rose slightly, by just 0.4 percent

That last line is the quiet one worth reading twice. Koreans didn’t close their accounts. They stopped using them. Exchanges make most of their money from trading fees, so when volume halves, revenue craters almost one-for-one — like a shopping mall where everyone still has a membership card but nobody’s visiting the stores.

The Core Conflict: Stocks Are Eating Crypto’s Lunch

The report lands amid clear evidence that Korean retail money has been rotating into equities. In May, the value of crypto held by South Korean investors fell 50.2 percent to about 60.6 trillion won — roughly 41.4 billion USD — over roughly a year, and Korean outlet ChosunBiz linked the decline directly to capital moving toward stocks. A Cointelegraph analysis in July added harder numbers: combined average daily volume across the country’s five major exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax — had fallen about 89 percent year over year during comparable seven-day periods.

The destination of that money tells the story. Over the 12 months to July 22, South Korea’s benchmark stock index, the KOSPI, had more than doubled. When a domestic stock market doubles in a year and crypto is chopping sideways, the “where do I put my savings” math answers itself for a typical household. This isn’t hostility to crypto — it’s opportunity cost, plain and simple.

Market Implications: Why the Rest of the World Should Care

Korean retail flow has historically amplified global crypto rallies — strong Korean demand tends to tighten supply on global exchanges and feed momentum. A 44 percent volume drop in that market is therefore a headwind the price charts don’t always label. It also helps explain a pattern traders have noticed all year: rallies that feel thinner and shallower than the enthusiasm around them, including Bitcoin’s grind in the mid-80,000 USD range this week, around 84,900 USD per CoinGecko data.

There’s a regulatory angle too. The survey covers registered, licensed operators — meaning the decline is happening in Korea’s legal market, the one with investor protections. That’s a data point regulators everywhere will read carefully: compliance alone doesn’t keep users engaged if the product experience and market conditions don’t compete. Meanwhile Korean policymakers keep building — the country recently advanced tokenized securities rules targeted for 2027 — betting the retail audience returns when markets do.

The Verdict: A Waiting Game, Not an Exit

Here’s how to think about it. Korea’s exchanges aren’t dying — they’re idle. Accounts held steady, the regulatory framework is expanding, and the money didn’t vanish; it moved into a stock market that’s been on a historic run. If crypto risk appetite returns globally, Korean retail has historically come back fast and loud, and the 78 percent profit collapse would flip just as quickly as it appeared. For your own portfolio, the practical takeaway is modest but real: Asia’s retail pulse is currently weak, so don’t count on Korean FOMO to rescue a stagnant market. Watch whether Korean trading volumes stabilize as a leading indicator — when Upbit and Bithumb light up again, that has historically been an early sign of broader risk-on money returning.

The cryptocurrency market remains highly volatile. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

28 thoughts on “South Korea’s Crypto Exchanges Lost 78 Percent of Their Profits in Six Months — KoFIU Data Shows Where the Money Went”

  1. kimchi premium shrinking while deposits sit in won is the healthiest version of a bad number. korean retail watched from cash instead of leverage this time, that is the difference vs 2022

  2. accounts up 0.4 percent while deposits fall 35 means they are all still there watching from the sidelines. the second the kimchi premium snaps back those fee tiers come straight back too

    1. premium snaps back the second one big alt runs, it always does. real question is whether fee tiers ever recover or upbit just eats the whole market at cost

    2. watching from the sidelines for a year straight tho. at some point sidelined money is just money that found somewhere else to live, the kospi run absorbed plenty of it

      1. kospi absorbing retail money is the part nobody in crypto wants to hear. why hold altcoin bags when shipbuilding stocks return 40 percent

        1. kospi shipbuilding running 30 percent ytd while alt volumes die, retail just found a casino with dividends. crypto gets them back the first time the index chops

        2. kospi at record highs while krw pairs thin out, retail didnt vanish it just found a hotter casino. crypto twitter blaming everything but the opportunity cost

        3. shipbuilding at 40 percent returns, of course deposits fell 35. crypto competes with opportunity cost now, not with convictions

  3. Deposits down 35% but accounts up 0.4% tells you everything: nobody left, they’re just not trading. Classic rotation into Kospi, same as every cycle. Korea comes back when crypto gives them a reason.

    1. The 0.4 percent account growth while deposits fell 35 is the quiet headline. Nobody closed their account, they just stopped pressing buttons.

  4. A 78% profit collapse on only a 44% volume drop means leverage on the cost side too. These exchanges ran fat during the bull and now the fee tiers will have to compress before volumes justify the overhead again.

    1. cost side leverage is the real story. 44 percent volume drop turning into 78 percent profit drop means fixed costs ate them alive

      1. exactly, and the 35 percent deposit drop makes it worse. customer deposits were the float these exchanges quietly earned on, that income walked out the door with the cash

        1. the float point is huge and underdiscussed. quietly earning on customer deposits was the real margin model, that 35 percent drop is permanent fee income gone

          1. the float point deserves more attention, deposits down 35 percent means the riskless income went with it. fee war plus float loss at the same time is exactly how 78 percent happens

  5. Genuine question for anyone tracking the Korean market: does this change anything for the KRW on-ramps, or do the big VASPs just eat thinner margins until retail risk appetite returns? 60 trillion won still parked there is not nothing.

    1. the on-ramps are fine, this hits exchange P&L not the VASP licenses. they will cut staff and ride it out, korean retail always comes back with the kimchi premium

      1. retail does come back but 60 trillion won parked in deposits while profits crash 78 percent means the fee war starts before volumes ever recover. upbit cuts first, everyone bleeds

    2. the big on-ramps survive this fine, the tail end doesnt. expect the smaller VASPs to merge or hand back licenses before volumes recover, 60 trillion wont pay for a dozen exchanges

    3. the big vasps eat the margins and the small ones get acquired. same consolidation japan went through, korea just does it louder

  6. 78 percent profit gone in six months with deposits only down 35 says the fee war already started. upbit and bithumb cant both survive on thinner spreads

    1. upbit wont eat the market at cost, itll just wait out the mid tiers until licenses get handed back. way cheaper than a fee war

    2. fee war is already visible in krw pair spreads, some mid tiers dropped to near zero taker fees. racing to the bottom with 78 percent less profit to fund it

      1. near zero taker fees with 78 percent less profit is burning the furniture to keep the house warm. someone at those mid tiers is praying for a volume miracle

  7. 60 trillion won in deposits propping up a dozen exchanges was never sustainable. the KoFIU number is just the receipt

  8. kimchi_premium_

    78 percent profit drop in six months and you can still count the surviving korean exchanges on one hand. the market share war is over, now its just a revenue collapse shared by fewer players

  9. KoFIU data has been showing shrinking volumes since the listing rules tightened. The exchanges that survive on altcoin trading fees get hit twice when both volume and listings fall.

  10. watch them pivot to listing fees and staking products to plug the hole. whenever an exchange business model dies on volume the retail user pays the difference somehow

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BTC$85,514.00+0.2%ETH$2,708.50+0.3%SOL$119.97-1.2%BNB$786.60-0.3%XRP$1.50-0.1%ADA$0.2647+6.5%DOGE$0.0948-0.7%DOT$1.20+0.0%AVAX$10.88-1.6%LINK$13.90-1.8%UNI$9.04+0.6%ATOM$1.81+2.7%LTC$70.63-0.8%ARB$0.2059+1.9%NEAR$5.11+2.2%FIL$1.11+5.8%SUI$1.19-2.5%BTC$85,514.00+0.2%ETH$2,708.50+0.3%SOL$119.97-1.2%BNB$786.60-0.3%XRP$1.50-0.1%ADA$0.2647+6.5%DOGE$0.0948-0.7%DOT$1.20+0.0%AVAX$10.88-1.6%LINK$13.90-1.8%UNI$9.04+0.6%ATOM$1.81+2.7%LTC$70.63-0.8%ARB$0.2059+1.9%NEAR$5.11+2.2%FIL$1.11+5.8%SUI$1.19-2.5%
Scroll to Top