📈 Get daily crypto insights that make you smarter about your money

Bitcoin at $5,900: Inside the 2018 Crypto Bear Market and How It Compares to the Devastating 2014 Crash

The Broad View

On June 28, 2018, Bitcoin trades at approximately $5,903, a level that would have seemed impossibly bullish just two years earlier but now represents a painful 69% decline from the December 2017 all-time high of $19,600. The cryptocurrency market has been locked in a relentless downtrend for over six months, with total market capitalization hovering around $243 billion — a fraction of the $800 billion peak reached during the height of crypto mania. Ethereum has fallen to $422, Ripple’s XRP sits at $0.45, and Bitcoin Cash has retreated to $660. The broad market tells a story of deflation after an unprecedented speculative bubble.

Yet beneath the surface of declining prices, a more nuanced narrative emerges. According to analysis from Bitcoin.com, the 2018 bear market — while severe — remains less devastating in percentage terms than the 2013-2015 cycle. In that earlier crash, Bitcoin plummeted 81.7% from its December 2013 peak of $1,236 to a low of $225 in June 2015. The current drawdown from $19,600 to roughly $5,900 represents a 69% decline — steep, but historically shallower than what early adopters endured during the Mt. Gox era.

The macro backdrop adds context. Global equity markets have been volatile in 2018, with trade tensions between the United States and China creating uncertainty across risk assets. Cryptocurrencies have not been immune to this risk-off sentiment. Low trading volumes across major exchanges suggest that many speculative participants have simply exited, leaving markets to a smaller cohort of more committed holders and traders.

Key Support and Resistance

Bitcoin’s immediate technical picture centers on the $6,000 level, which has emerged as a critical support zone throughout June. Max Kortrakul, CEO of cryptocurrency trading platform Carboneum, noted that Bitcoin’s ability to hold above $5,800 during mid-June dips was a positive sign. “There is still optimism within the market,” Kortrakul said, pointing to the $6,000 area as a psychological floor.

The resistance levels above are equally telling. Bitcoin briefly spiked above $7,500 in late May before reversing, establishing that level as the first major resistance. Beyond that, the $8,400-8,800 zone — where Bitcoin consolidated in February — represents a thicker band of overhead supply from traders who bought during that period and are now underwater.

For altcoins, the picture is even more challenging. Ethereum’s $422 price represents a significant decline from its 2018 highs near $1,400. EOS has been particularly volatile, briefly surging above $8 on June 27 following news that a co-founder proposed scrapping the project’s constitution, before falling back to the $7.45 range. Ethereum Classic stands as a rare outlier, gaining approximately 5% to trade above $15.20 on June 28.

Across the broader market, approximately 80% of the 1,586 cryptocurrencies tracked by Finder.com declined during the week ending June 25, with an average decline of 19%. The correlation between assets remains high, suggesting that market participants are treating cryptocurrencies as a single risk class rather than evaluating individual projects on merit.

Institutional Flows

The institutional narrative that dominated late 2017 and early 2018 has quieted considerably. Bitcoin’s dominance has stabilized around 42%, recovering from lows near 38% earlier in the year as altcoins sold off even harder than the market leader. This rotation suggests that when institutional capital does return, it gravitates toward Bitcoin as the most liquid and established cryptocurrency.

The ICO market, once the primary vehicle for capital inflows into the crypto ecosystem, has shown signs of strain. ICOs have raised $11.75 billion in 2018 alone according to CoinSchedule, but the quality of these raises has deteriorated markedly. Satis Group, an ICO advisory firm, reported in March that fewer than 4% of ICOs raising between $50 million and $100 million could be classified as successful or promising. Aaron Brown, a business author and investor writing for Bloomberg, estimated that 80% of ICOs were outright frauds, with another 10% lacking substance and failing shortly after raising money.

The human cost of these failures is measurable. Lex Sokolin, global director of fintech strategy at Autonomous Research, estimated that investors may have lost as much as $500 million to failed ICO projects. The collapse of BitConnect — whose market capitalization shrank from nearly $3 billion to roughly $4 million — stands as the most dramatic example, but hundreds of smaller projects have vanished quietly.

Sentiment Indicators

Sentiment across the crypto market sits firmly in bearish territory. Mainstream media outlets have amplified the narrative of decline, with 99Bitcoins counting 319 articles declaring Bitcoin’s demise since 2010. The “Bitcoin is dead” meme has become a contrarian indicator for some long-term holders, who point out that Bitcoin has survived every previous declaration of its death.

CB Insights data provides a sobering view of the broader blockchain startup ecosystem. Of 103 blockchain companies that received seed or angel funding in 2013 and 2014, only 28% managed to raise additional funding. This compares unfavorably with the 46% follow-on rate for traditional tech companies that raised between 2008 and 2010. Arieh Levi, an analyst at CB Insights, summed up the challenge: “I don’t think we found the killer app yet. It just seems like there’s been a lot of projects tried, but there aren’t really many users of blockchain protocols beyond speculators and traders.”

Trading volumes across major pairs have declined significantly from their January peaks, suggesting market fatigue rather than accumulation. The low turnover environment makes prices more susceptible to sharp moves in either direction, as relatively small orders can move markets disproportionately.

The Bull/Bear Case

The bear case is straightforward: Bitcoin has broken below multiple technical support levels, volume is declining, and the ICO-funded startup ecosystem is imploding. Regulatory pressure continues to mount globally, and the speculative fervor that drove prices to $19,600 has evaporated. If $6,000 fails as support, the next logical levels sit at $5,000 and then $3,000 — the latter representing a roughly 85% decline from the ATH, which would make this bear market worse than 2013-2015.

The bull case rests on historical precedent and fundamental development. Bitcoin has survived worse drawdowns before and emerged stronger each time. The network’s hash rate continues to grow, indicating that miners remain committed to long-term profitability. Lightning Network development is progressing, promising to address Bitcoin’s scaling challenges. And the current drawdown, while painful, has been more orderly than the 2013-2015 cycle, suggesting a maturing market structure.

Kortrakul’s perspective captures the pragmatic middle ground: “Volatility and the cryptocurrency market go hand in hand, and BTC price has always been exposed to external factors that have affected its market value such as large sell-offs or security breaches.” The key question for the second half of 2018 is whether the market has found a sustainable floor or whether the decline has further to run.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

🌱 FOR BUSINESSES BitcoinsNews.com
Reach 100K+ Crypto Readers
Sponsored content, press releases, banner ads, and newsletter placements. Put your brand in front of Bitcoin's most engaged audience.

11 thoughts on “Bitcoin at $5,900: Inside the 2018 Crypto Bear Market and How It Compares to the Devastating 2014 Crash”

  1. drawdown_maxi

    69% from ATH sounds brutal until you remember 2014 was an 81.7% drawdown. every cycle people think its different, its not

    1. numbers are right but context matters. 2014 had literal theft at mt gox. 2018 was just leverage unwinding

    2. the 2014 drawdown took 400+ days to bottom. 2018 bottomed faster but everyone was still calling for $1k BTC back then

      1. Tanya V. people calling for $1k BTC in 2018 were the same people calling for $100k in 2017. market sentiment is always wrong at the extremes

    1. drawdown_maxi covered the numbers. whats lazy is comparing two crashes with totally different market structures. 2014 had mt gox literally stealing coins, 2018 was just retail panic selling

      1. bear_survivor

        chart_eyez 2014 was an 81% drawdown caused by actual theft. 2018 was a 69% drawdown caused by leveraged retail getting washed out. totally different causes similar pain

        1. this. mt gox was a trust failure not a market failure. completely different mechanisms producing similar charts

        2. bear_survivor different causes same retail pain. leveraged longs got washed in 2018 same as mt gox holders got rekt in 2014. the mechanism changes the outcome doesnt

    2. Ingrid M. ETH at $422 wasnt the bottom either. went all the way to $84 in december 2018. the mt goox comparison missed how far things could still fall

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BTC$65,702.00+1.9%ETH$1,719.22+2.5%SOL$71.45+4.7%BNB$615.99+0.8%XRP$1.18+3.0%ADA$0.1807+5.5%DOGE$0.0885+1.6%DOT$1.00+3.5%AVAX$6.77+1.7%LINK$8.20+3.7%UNI$2.60+2.8%ATOM$1.96+1.1%LTC$45.16+2.4%ARB$0.0870+4.2%NEAR$2.39+12.7%FIL$0.8038+4.2%SUI$0.7966+5.1%BTC$65,702.00+1.9%ETH$1,719.22+2.5%SOL$71.45+4.7%BNB$615.99+0.8%XRP$1.18+3.0%ADA$0.1807+5.5%DOGE$0.0885+1.6%DOT$1.00+3.5%AVAX$6.77+1.7%LINK$8.20+3.7%UNI$2.60+2.8%ATOM$1.96+1.1%LTC$45.16+2.4%ARB$0.0870+4.2%NEAR$2.39+12.7%FIL$0.8038+4.2%SUI$0.7966+5.1%
Scroll to Top