Bitcoin managed to claw its way back to the $40,000 level on April 16, 2022, offering a temporary reprieve for crypto investors after a bruising week that saw the leading cryptocurrency lose more than 5.5% of its value. But beneath the surface of this modest rebound, the macro environment was painting an increasingly precarious picture for risk assets across the board.
TL;DR
- Bitcoin rebounded to approximately $40,424 after declining below key support levels earlier in the week
- BTC was down 5.51% over the prior seven days amid aggressive Federal Reserve tightening signals
- Ethereum traded at $3,062, with the broader altcoin market also under pressure
- Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled more rate hikes ahead, rattling both traditional and crypto markets
- Celsius introduced new “Custody” accounts for non-accredited U.S. investors amid regulatory uncertainty
Bitcoin’s Battle at $40,000
The $40,000 level has emerged as a critical psychological and technical battleground for Bitcoin throughout the first half of 2022. After rallying above $48,000 in late March, BTC entered a sustained downtrend that accelerated in mid-April as Federal Reserve officials delivered increasingly hawkish rhetoric about the pace and magnitude of coming interest rate hikes.
According to CoinMarketCap data, Bitcoin was trading at $40,424 on April 16, representing a 0.32% decline over the previous 24 hours but a more concerning 5.51% drop over the trailing seven days. The cryptocurrency’s market capitalization stood at approximately $768.6 billion, with 24-hour trading volumes reaching $16.8 billion — a sign that significant selling pressure was still present even as prices stabilized near the key round-number support.
The rebound to $40,000 offered some comfort to bulls, but market participants remained cautious. The pattern of lower highs and lower lows that had characterized Bitcoin’s price action since November 2021’s all-time high near $69,000 was still firmly intact, and many analysts warned that a decisive break below $37,000 could trigger a much deeper correction.
Fed Tightening Casts a Long Shadow
The primary driver of the crypto market’s weakness was the Federal Reserve’s aggressive pivot toward monetary tightening. With U.S. inflation running at its highest level in four decades, Fed Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues had made clear that rapid interest rate increases were on the table, along with a significant reduction in the central bank’s balance sheet.
The Wall Street Journal captured the mood in an April 15 headline: “The Fed Is on the March. Can Your Bond Fund Keep Up?” The article detailed how bond investors had been pummeled by the central bank’s tightening campaign, with significant losses across fixed-income portfolios. The same dynamics were weighing heavily on risk assets of all types, from technology stocks to cryptocurrencies.
For Bitcoin, which had benefited enormously from the Fed’s ultra-accommodative monetary policy during the COVID-19 pandemic, the reversal was particularly painful. The flood of liquidity that had helped drive BTC from under $10,000 to nearly $69,000 was now receding, and the market was struggling to find a new equilibrium in a higher-rate environment.
Ethereum and the Broader Market
Ethereum was also under significant pressure, trading at approximately $3,062 on April 16 — a level that represented a modest 0.04% decline over the prior hour but masked much steeper losses over longer timeframes. ETH’s market capitalization stood at roughly $368.7 billion, and the second-largest cryptocurrency had been unable to maintain momentum above the $3,200 resistance level.
The broader altcoin market told a similar story of weakness. Among the top-traded coins, Tether (USDT) held steady, while Bitcoin managed a slight 1.0% gain in spot trading. However, the overall market sentiment remained firmly in “fear” territory, with investors reluctant to add exposure amid so much macroeconomic uncertainty.
Celsius Adjusts Strategy Amid Regulatory Pressure
In a sign of the growing regulatory pressures facing the crypto lending industry, Celsius announced on April 15 that it would begin offering “Custody” accounts for non-accredited U.S. investors. The move represented a significant shift for the platform, which had previously offered high-yield earning products to all users regardless of accreditation status.
Under the new framework, non-accredited investors in several U.S. states could keep their existing assets in custody accounts, but these new deposits would not earn interest — a direct response to increasing regulatory scrutiny from state and federal securities regulators. The change was viewed by many in the industry as a preview of broader regulatory constraints that could reshape the crypto lending landscape in the months ahead.
Why This Matters
Bitcoin’s struggle to hold the $40,000 level in April 2022 reflects a fundamental shift in the macro environment that would define crypto markets for the remainder of the year. The era of easy money that had fueled crypto’s explosive growth was ending, and the transition to a tighter monetary regime was proving painful for risk assets.
The Celsius custody account changes also foreshadowed the broader regulatory crackdown that would intensify throughout 2022 and beyond, eventually reshaping how crypto platforms operate in the United States. For investors, the lesson was clear: crypto no longer trades in isolation from traditional macroeconomic forces, and Fed policy decisions now matter as much for Bitcoin as they do for the S&P 500.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial a
powell signaling more hikes and btc barely holding 40k. the macro crowd was right to be bearish here, this was just the start of the bleed
macro_pain_ powell hikes were the obvious signal. june CPI came in at 9.1 percent and anyone still holding above 40k was in pure denial. the bleed to 17.6k was inevitable
june survivor calling the 9.1% CPI as the signal is correct. powell hiked into that print and 40k was just a resting point on the way to 17.6k
celsius launching custody accounts 8 weeks before freezing withdrawals should be a case study in hubris. mashinsky was next level
The 5.51% weekly drop looks tame compared to what came next. June and July were absolutely brutal for anyone who thought $40k was the floor.
macro_pain_ powell hikes were the obvious signal. anyone who looked at the CPI print in june knew 40k wasnt holding. the real pain came july through november
macro_pain_ powell was signaling more hikes and barely holding 40k. the macro crowd was right to be bearish, this was just the start
40k was not the floor, 17.6k was the floor. anyone who bought at 40k thinking it was support had to wait over a year to break even
Jamal H. bought at 40k and averaged all the way down to 22k. the 17.6k bottom almost broke me. held through it but that year took years off my life
bought at 38k averaging down, sold at 44k thinking i was smart. then watched it dump to 17k. the hubris was unreal
jamal_h bought at 40k and averaged down all the way to 22k. the 17.6k bottom almost broke me. held through it but that year took years off my life
Elena M. 5.5 percent weekly drop was nothing. june to november was a 55 percent nosedive. anyone who bought this dip got buried
ETH at 3062 looking expensive in retrospect. the merge narrative was the only thing keeping it from imploding faster
funny seeing celsius mentioned here launching custody accounts. 2 months later they froze withdrawals. wild timeline
celsius_survivor mashinsky was literally on youtube saying your funds are safe in april and froze withdrawals in june. the custody accounts they launched here were the exit liquidity
powell signalling more hikes and people were still buying 40k like it was a discount. the 17.6k bottom was mathematically inevitable
celsius launching custody accounts in april and freezing in june is the most crypto timeline thing ever. mashinsky was literally on youtube saying your funds are safe while the hole was already there
celsius launching custody accounts in april 2022 and freezing withdrawals in june. the irony of trying to look compliant while insolvent
the celsius timeline is wild. april: heres our new custody product. june: sorry we lost your money. 8 weeks between innovation and insolvency
mashinsky was literally on youtube saying your funds are safe while the hole was already there. 8 weeks between launching custody and freezing withdrawals
Otto K nailing the celsius timeline. 8 weeks from launching custody accounts to freezing withdrawals. mashinsky was pitching new products while already insolvent
Trine L. the 9.1 CPI print was the knife. powell couldnt ignore it anymore and 40k was just a layover to 17k. brutal stuff
Trine L. 8 weeks is generous. launched custody on april 16, froze withdrawals june 13. less than 60 days from new product to insolvency reveal
my business partner wanted to accept btc payments in 2015 and i talked him out of it because of uncertainty. still feel bad about that one