📈 Get daily crypto insights that make you smarter about your money

CLARITY Act and GENIUS Act Advance Through Congress with Bipartisan Support

By Raj Patel | March 4, 2026

The U.S. Congress is making significant progress on two landmark pieces of legislation that could reshape the cryptocurrency regulatory landscape. The CLARITY Act and GENIUS Act are advancing through the legislative process with bipartisan support.

CLARITY Act Provisions

The CLARITY Act aims to establish clear definitions for digital assets, distinguishing between securities and commodities. The legislation would provide the CFTC with jurisdiction over most cryptocurrency tokens, reducing regulatory ambiguity that has plagued the industry.

Key provisions include streamlined registration processes for crypto businesses, consumer protection measures, and clear guidelines for token classification.

GENIUS Act Focus on Innovation

The GENIUS Act complements these efforts by focusing on fostering innovation while maintaining appropriate safeguards. The legislation includes provisions for regulatory sandboxes, reduced barriers to entry for startups, and clear pathways for institutional participation.

Industry observers note that the combination of congressional action and SEC policy shifts could establish the United States as a leader in crypto regulation, potentially attracting significant capital and talent.

Legislative developments reported for informational purposes.

🌱 FOR BUSINESSES BitcoinsNews.com
Reach 100K+ Crypto Readers
Sponsored content, press releases, banner ads, and newsletter placements. Put your brand in front of Bitcoin's most engaged audience.

22 thoughts on “CLARITY Act and GENIUS Act Advance Through Congress with Bipartisan Support”

    1. sandboxes in the GENIUS Act are the smartest policy move. let startups test without committing to full compliance on day one

      1. streamlined registration is what every crypto business has asked for since 2019. better late than never

      2. legal_eagle_

        been waiting since 2019 is right. every exchange had to lawyer up just to figure out if they were breaking the law. criminal ambiguity

        1. legal_eagle_ criminal ambiguity was the feature not the bug. SEC used it selectively to pick winners and losers. these bills end that strategy

        2. legal_eagle 7 years of criminal ambiguity and counting. these bills shouldve passed in 2021. better late than never but the damage is done

        3. legal_eagle_ 7 years is nothing compared to how long traditional finance regulation took. the speed actually concerns me because rushed bills have loopholes

          1. stablecoin_sam

            Anika R. 7 years is actually fast for financial regulation. dodd-frank took nearly a decade and that was after a crisis. the loophole concern is real though

    2. draft_escape_

      beltway_btc_ sandboxes in the GENIUS Act are the one good idea here. startups testing without full compliance overhead is how you actually encourage innovation

      1. Mira Srivastava

        draft_escape_ sandboxes are good in theory but the GENIUS Act version lets startups test for 18 months then face full compliance with no transition support. thats not a sandbox its a trap door

  1. CFTC getting jurisdiction makes sense for commodities. the real question is where they draw the line on what counts as a security

    1. sven the real question is enforcement. CFTC getting jurisdiction sounds great until you realize their enforcement budget is a fraction of the SEC

      1. compliance_tax

        Bence H. enforcement budget is the bottleneck nobody talks about. CFTC gets jurisdiction and then what, 50 more lawyers?

        1. compliance_tax CFTC getting 50 more lawyers would still leave them outnumbered 10 to 1 by the firms they regulate. enforcement gap is structural

          1. enforcement_void_

            Greta N. 10 to 1 ratio is generous. CFTC has like 700 total staff vs thousands of SEC lawyers. giving them more jurisdiction without budget is theater

    2. Tomoko Hayashi

      the howey test has been a disaster for crypto classification. giving CFTC jurisdiction over most tokens would finally let builders know which rules apply

      1. Tomoko Hayashi the Howey test was never designed for digital assets. forcing 1946 securities law onto tokenized networks was always going to be a mess

        1. Anya D. Howey test was designed for citrus groves in Florida in 1946. applying it to programmable tokens on a global blockchain was always going to produce absurd results

  2. giving CFTC jurisdiction over most tokens is smart but the budget question is real. they barely have resources for commodity enforcement as is

  3. howey_burial_

    the GENIUS Act sandboxes sound great until you realize startups get 18 months then face full compliance with zero transition support. trap door not a sandbox

  4. Mira Srivastava pointed this out already. 18 month sandbox then full CFTC compliance. most startups will just offshore instead

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BTC$65,095.00+1.0%ETH$1,962.02+4.3%SOL$76.19+1.7%BNB$572.73+0.3%XRP$1.11+0.6%ADA$0.1648-0.2%DOGE$0.0725-1.1%DOT$0.8080-2.0%AVAX$6.63-1.7%LINK$8.79+4.5%UNI$3.90+6.6%ATOM$1.39-0.2%LTC$46.99-0.2%ARB$0.0816-1.2%NEAR$1.84+2.0%FIL$0.7364-2.0%SUI$0.7141-0.5%BTC$65,095.00+1.0%ETH$1,962.02+4.3%SOL$76.19+1.7%BNB$572.73+0.3%XRP$1.11+0.6%ADA$0.1648-0.2%DOGE$0.0725-1.1%DOT$0.8080-2.0%AVAX$6.63-1.7%LINK$8.79+4.5%UNI$3.90+6.6%ATOM$1.39-0.2%LTC$46.99-0.2%ARB$0.0816-1.2%NEAR$1.84+2.0%FIL$0.7364-2.0%SUI$0.7141-0.5%
Scroll to Top