Ethereum Classic (ETC)
8.74
39.92
-78.1%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, 50d rising, MACD+, RSI healthy (66.1), rising 1m & 3m, strong bull trend (ADX 35.7), accumulation (OBV up, vol ratio 1.81)
Bearish factors: death cross, far below high
Low: 6.02
Now: 8.74
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 66.1 | ADX (14) | 35.7 |
| 50d MA | 7.27 | 200d MA | 7.78 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 7.09 | Resistance | 8.99 |
| ATR Volatility | 4.72%/day | Trend | BUY |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| ETC | +20.0% | +26.5% | -5.5% | -34.1% |
| BTC | +4.7% | +26.1% | +3.7% | -13.7% |
| ETH | +8.7% | +40.8% | +18.7% | -19.3% |
| SOL | +10.1% | +45.8% | +24.5% | -22.0% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| ETC | -7.6% | -42.9% | -31.0% | 61 | 43% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (ETC)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -34.1% | 5,608 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -14.5% | 10,257 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -13.8% | 10,343 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -7.1% | 11,142 |
ETC Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 7.61 (-13.0%) |
| Target 1 | 10.00 (14.4%) |
| Target 2 | 10.00 (14.4%) |
| Entry quality | Midrange (R:R 1.09) |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-09-11 | BUY | 7.63 | |
| 2026-09-12 | SELL | 7.61 | -0.2% |
| 2026-09-13 | BUY | 7.43 | |
| 2026-09-14 | SELL | 7.56 | +1.8% |
| 2026-09-15 | BUY | 7.19 | |
| 2026-09-16 | SELL | 7.37 | +2.5% |
| 2026-09-17 | BUY | 7.51 | |
| 2026-09-18 | SELL | 8.15 | +8.5% |
| 2026-09-19 | BUY | 8.57 | |
| 2026-09-20 | SELL | 8.53 | -0.5% |
| 2026-09-21 | BUY | 8.74 | |
| END | SELL | 8.74 | +0.0% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
death cross still printed on the chart and they call BUY at 8.74, bold. ADX 35.7 is real trend strength tho
the 50d at 7.27 and rising is the whole thesis here. 8.99 resistance is the real test, above that this looks different
ETC has faked that exact setup before, june retest of 7.09 turned into a breakdown in days. i only trust it above a weekly close at 8.99
43% win rate over 61 trades is exactly why the BUY works tho. trend systems only need a few big winners, the -7.6% backtest proves the losers stay small
61 trades is still a thin sample, one monster winner can flatter the whole curve. agreed on the logic tho, sized in small and adding over 8.99 only
61 trades IS thin but every trend backtest has that problem. you size for it instead of pretending the sample is gospel
the -78% from 39.92 is the whale in the other direction. trend systems on ETC are a coin flip with extra steps, size tiny or not at all
43 percent win rate works until the trend never arrives and you eat 30 small losses in a row. the backtest had a trend, live trading might not
thats the trade with any trend system, chop losses for trend gains. a -7.6% backtest in a year where lump sum lost 34% is the whole proof
61 trades at 43% is one whale winner away from looking great or mediocre. still rather run that than lump sum down 34%, the sizing table settles it
BUY signal on something still down 78% from 39.92. contrarian in me loves it, the death cross part scares me
Look at the lump sum table though. DCA with 12 buys lost only 7.1% vs -34.1% lump. Thats the whole argument for scaling in slowly here
the death cross spooked me too until i checked when it printed. most of the drop from 39.92 was already done by then, its a rearview mirror signal
death cross after a 78 percent drawdown is just confirmation of damage already done. the real risk at 8.74 is being early, the signal itself is fine
death cross is lagging by definition, it printed after most of the -78% already happened. by the time it flips back you are chasing, not entering
43% win rate over 61 trades and the backtest only lost 7.6%? that tells me the winners were way bigger than the losers. trend following in a nutshell
meanwhile lump sum bagholders from a year ago are down 34% and 12-buy DCA only -7.1%. timing matters more than people admit
4.72% ATR daily volatility is spicy. size accordingly or get shaken out at 7.09 support
7.09 support already got tested twice this week and held both times, thats my line not 8.99. agree on sizing tho, that ATR will shake out anyone running full position
entry at 8.74 with 4.72 percent daily ATR means tranche one is underwater by lunch. the thesis is fine, sizing discipline is the actual trade
8.99 resistance is doing all the heavy lifting in this thesis. below that 8.74 is just range middle, i want the breakout before calling an entry
8.99 is the old shelf if you zoom out to the 2023 chart. above it there is basically air till the teens, which is why every reply here is camped on it
air till the teens checks out on the weekly but that shelf only matters while 7.09 keeps holding. lose that level and 8.99 becomes a memory, not a target
7.09 holding twice plus a rising 50d at 7.27 is decent confluence tbh. still want a weekly close above 8.99 before tranche two tho
everyone arguing the death cross while etc quietly holds 7.09 twice this week. the rising 50d at 7.27 is the quiet part of this story