Ethereum (ETH)
2747.76
4953.73
-44.5%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, golden cross, 50d rising, MACD+, RSI healthy (69.3), rising 1m & 3m, strong bull trend (ADX 47.4), breakout above upper band, accumulation (OBV up, vol ratio 1.53)
Bearish factors: far below high
Low: 1386.80
Now: 2747.76
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 69.3 | ADX (14) | 47.4 |
| 50d MA | 2309.10 | 200d MA | 2083.50 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 2356.19 | Resistance | 2805.50 |
| ATR Volatility | 3.6%/day | Trend | BUY |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| ETH | +13.7% | +42.5% | +20.5% | -18.1% |
| BTC | +11.4% | +29.6% | +6.3% | -11.1% |
| ETH | +13.6% | +42.5% | +20.5% | -18.1% |
| SOL | +18.0% | +51.1% | +28.1% | -19.6% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| ETH | +51.5% | +75.3% | -22.6% | 69 | 49% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (ETH)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -18.1% | 7,916 |
| DCA — 4 buys | +12.8% | 13,534 |
| DCA — 6 buys | +10.8% | 13,292 |
| DCA — 12 buys | +13.7% | 13,648 |
ETH Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 2477.74 (-9.8%) |
| Target 1 | 2995.00 (9.0%) |
| Target 2 | 3144.00 (14.4%) |
| Entry quality | Midrange (R:R 1.1) |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-08-11 | BUY | 1881.37 | |
| 2026-08-12 | SELL | 1878.13 | -0.2% |
| 2026-08-13 | BUY | 1883.99 | |
| 2026-08-14 | SELL | 1880.65 | -0.2% |
| 2026-08-15 | BUY | 1880.91 | |
| 2026-08-16 | SELL | 1873.94 | -0.4% |
| 2026-08-17 | BUY | 1912.20 | |
| 2026-08-18 | SELL | 1916.46 | +0.2% |
| 2026-08-28 | BUY | 2442.54 | |
| 2026-08-29 | SELL | 2457.69 | +0.6% |
| 2026-08-30 | BUY | 2417.94 | |
| END | SELL | 2747.76 | +13.6% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
r:r 1.1 on a midrange entry and the banner still says HIGH conviction lol. system says buy, fine, but a stop at 2477 when support sits at 2356 is optimistic
midrange r:r AND rsi already at 69.3? thats buying almost into your own 82 sell trigger with extra steps
rsi 69 on a system that only sells at 82 is fine, thats the whole point of the band. you would never hold a trend otherwise
rsi 69 with the sell band at 82 is 13 points of runway, that leg is fine. the midrange r:r is the weak part of this entry, not the oscillator
13 points of oscillator runway means nothing if 2805 rejects the first test. the band saves you in trends, resistance is what kills late entries
13 points of oscillator runway is how people ride 69 all the way to the 82 sell band and call it discipline the whole way up. if 2805 rejects on first touch that runway is just a slower exit
the 2477 stop above the 2356 support at least lets the trade breathe. a tighter stop under 2356 gets wicked out on any normal retest anyway
a stop at 2477 with entry at 2747 risks 10 percent on a 1.1 r:r. the system survives on the 22.6 dd backtest, this particular entry is mid at best
1.1 r:r is the honest cost of waiting for ADX 47 confirmation. the 2356 retest entry never came, trend systems tax you either way
r:r 1.1 midrange is thin, but the backtest carried a 22.6 percent max drawdown, the system clearly survived uglier entries than this one
the stop placement is the give. id rather size down and stop under 2356 than eat a full retrace from a 2747 entry
stop under 2356 with quarter size does the same job. full entry at 2747 hoping 2805 breaks is donating spread
quarter size at 2747 with stop under 2356 is still 400 points of risk on a trend that already ran. rather miss the 2805 retest than fund it
quarter size at 2747 with stop under 2356 is still 400 points of risk on a trend that already ran. rather miss the 2805 retest than fund it
RSI at 69.3 and they still call it healthy, last time i bought that narrative i got chopped at the top for a month
I ran something close to this, 50/200 cross with the RSI filter, for about two years on ETH. The ADX gate is the part that actually saves you in chop, and 47.4 is real trend strength, not noise.
And after all that backtesting you are still down 44.5% from the 4953 high. These simulations look lovely right up until a death cross gaps straight through a 2477 stop.
trend systems dont care where the old high sits, ADX 47.4 says the move is real. but agreed, a 2477 stop perched above 2356 support is doing a lot of hopeful work
Backtest shows +51.5% with a -22.6% max drawdown on a 12k portfolio. The drawdown is the part nobody prices in when the green BUY banner is this loud.
@Ines right, but ADX 47.4 is a genuinely strong trend, youre paying for that drawdown with real momentum not chop. still wouldnt enter full size with resistance at 2805 this close
The drawdown line deserves its own chart. Plus 51.5 percent sounds clean until you sit through minus 22.6 on a 12k account.
minus 22.6 on paper feels abstract until it is 2,700 of a 12k account gone. sizing discipline is the actual edge here, not the signal
vol ratio 1.53 plus a breakout above the upper band, this is a late stage trend not an early one. entering at 2747 is paying premium for confirmation
paying for confirmation is the whole point of trend systems tho. the ADX gate keeps you out of chop and 47.4 doesnt come cheap
paying 2747 for a late stage trend is the cost of ADX confirmation. entering early without it means catching the chop before the move, pick your fee
22.6 percent max drawdown in the backtest and everyone still sizes like the drawdown happens to someone else. the system is fine, the humans holding it are the risk
stop at 2477 perched above 2356 support with r:r at 1.1, the math only works if 2805 breaks fast. otherwise this is a premium entry into a chop sandwich
Exactly the problem. r:r 1.1 at 2747 only pays if momentum does the work immediately. Split it instead, half now, half on the 2356 retest, even if that order never fills