Hedera (HBAR)
0.07
0.40
-81.6%
Stage 3 (Topping)
Bullish factors: golden cross, 50d rising
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, MACD-, RSI weak (31.1), falling 1m & 3m, far below high, distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.75)
Low: 0.04
Now: 0.07
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 31.1 | ADX (14) | 21.4 |
| 50d MA | 0.09 | 200d MA | 0.08 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.07 | Resistance | 0.11 |
| ATR Volatility | 5.92%/day | Trend | SELL |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| HBAR | -18.5% | -6.5% | -8.6% | -26.2% |
| BTC | +0.1% | +1.8% | +27.2% | +20.2% |
| ETH | -4.2% | -5.7% | +36.1% | +20.2% |
| SOL | -6.3% | -6.1% | +40.2% | +21.2% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| HBAR | +20.3% | -61.5% | -31.5% | 47 | 43% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (HBAR)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -26.2% | 4,496 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -24.4% | 9,067 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -24.2% | 9,099 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -22.9% | 9,248 |
HBAR Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.06 (-11.8%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-09-23 | BUY | 0.09 | |
| 2026-09-24 | SELL | 0.09 | +2.9% |
| 2026-09-25 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| 2026-09-26 | SELL | 0.09 | -2.0% |
| 2026-09-27 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| 2026-09-28 | SELL | 0.12 | +27.1% |
| 2026-09-29 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| 2026-09-30 | SELL | 0.10 | +2.3% |
| 2026-10-01 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| 2026-10-02 | SELL | 0.10 | -0.2% |
| 2026-10-03 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| 2026-10-14 | SELL | 0.08 | -17.2% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
-81.6% off the 0.40 high and the bullish case is a golden cross? the 50d rising means nothing down here, avoid is right
golden crosses lag horribly in a downtrend, learned that the hard way on my own bags. hard agree
held hbar since the council days. 0.40 to 0.07 and they call it stage 3 topping, generous wording lol
same boat, trimmed at 0.19 and still salty about the rest
target of 10.00 printed as -100% from a 0.07 price, someone shipped this analysis with a broken calculator lol
lmao target 1 printed as 0.00 at -100%. someone’s formatter clearly gave up on a sub-10-cent price. embarrassing on a 12k portfolio piece, but honestly the avoid call stands fine on its own without the broken math
the target math is clearly off but the avoid call itself is right. stop at 0.06 under a 0.07 entry is a 12% hair trigger, most people cant hold that
exactly this. a 12% stop on something that moves 5% a day is just donating to the exchange. the correct fix is a wider stop with smaller size, but nobody wants to hear that part
the DCA backtest showing -22.9% over 12 buys is the part that gets me. even the patient crowd got cooked here
-22.9% across 12 buys tells the whole story. DCA works in a range, in a -81% bleed it’s just slow-motion capitulation with extra steps
2 bull vs 7 bear factors and retail will still average down because council governance sounds fancy. from 0.40 to 0.07 the market already delivered its verdict