Deep Dive Analysis
JUST (JST)
2026-09-15 15:00 UTC · Oliver Schmidt · 35,000 Portfolio
PRICE
0.12
0.12
52W HIGH
0.12
0.12
DRAWDOWN
-0.4%
-0.4%
STAGE
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
🟡 WAIT — No Clear Edge
Trend-Following System · MEDIUM Conviction · 9 Bull / 0 Bear Factors
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, golden cross, 50d rising, MACD+, RSI healthy (67.0), rising 1m & 3m, near 52w high, accumulation (OBV up, vol ratio 1.81)
JST Price — 1 Year
1Y Ago: 0.04
Low: 0.03
Now: 0.12
Low: 0.03
Now: 0.12
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 67.0 | ADX (14) | 16.5 |
| 50d MA | 0.10 | 200d MA | 0.09 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 0.09 | Resistance | 0.12 |
| ATR Volatility | 3.21%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| JST | +16.2% | +15.4% | +34.3% | +169.5% |
| BTC | -3.4% | +16.9% | -5.1% | -16.9% |
| ETH | -1.4% | +27.5% | +5.2% | -23.9% |
| SOL | +2.4% | +27.2% | +11.9% | -27.4% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 35,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
FINAL VALUE
66,418
RETURN
+89.8%
MAX DRAWDOWN
-37.5%
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| JST | +89.8% | +268.9% | -37.5% | 49 | 47% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (JST)
If you had deployed 35,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | +169.5% | 122,477 |
| DCA — 4 buys | +146.1% | 86,142 |
| DCA — 6 buys | +134.2% | 81,977 |
| DCA — 12 buys | +130.5% | 80,671 |
JST Deployment Plan — 35,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Oliver Schmidt (Conservative / Institutional). If you’re managing a 35,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 5,250 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.10 (-10.1%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Extended (R:R 0.95) |
| Max concurrent positions | 10 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Conservative / Institutional.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-01-21 | BUY | 0.04 | |
| 2026-01-27 | SELL | 0.04 | -9.8% |
| 2026-01-28 | BUY | 0.04 | |
| 2026-02-03 | SELL | 0.04 | -8.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | BUY | 0.04 | |
| 2026-02-12 | SELL | 0.04 | -3.2% |
| 2026-02-16 | BUY | 0.04 | |
| 2026-06-03 | SELL | 0.07 | +71.7% |
| 2026-06-28 | BUY | 0.09 | |
| 2026-08-24 | SELL | 0.10 | +13.9% |
| 2026-09-01 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| END | SELL | 0.12 | +12.5% |
Generated by BitcoinsNews.com Coin Analysis Engine · 2026-09-15 15:00 UTC
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
+169% on the year while btc is down 17 and they still call it WAIT. system says no clear edge but 9 bull factors 0 bear lol make it make sense
The reason is right there in the table. Price is sitting exactly on resistance at 0.12 with RSI 67. Strong momentum, bad entry point. That is a hold, not a buy.
the WAIT is because every factor is momentum lagging. system sees the run already happened, no edge left to capture
ADX 16.5 is the part nobody mentions. trend strength is basically flat, all those bull factors are just the aftermath of one big run up
ran this same 50d/200d backtest logic on JST in 2023, got chopped to death on the fakeouts. RSI filter helps but 3.2% daily volatility will test you
adx this low after a 169% run usually means distribution not continuation. hold and trail a stop feels right
35k on a hold signal is bold sizing. id size a HOLD at half a BUY, the whole point is no edge
HOLD at the 52 week high is a bold call. most analysis pieces would say take profits around 0.12 and rebuy later
fair point but tron stuff has a habit of grinding higher once it gets going. held JST through worse
curious how the 35k gets split across entries. the piece mentions a deployment plan but no tranche sizes or intervals