MemeCore (M)
0.00
0.00
-85.0%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: 50d rising, RSI healthy (60.1), rising 1m & 3m, strong bull trend (ADX 45.6)
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, far below high
Low: 0.00
Now: 0.00
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 60.1 | ADX (14) | 45.6 |
| 50d MA | 0.00 | 200d MA | 0.00 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.00 | Resistance | 0.00 |
| ATR Volatility | 2.74%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| M | +8.5% | +24.3% | +11.4% | -35.6% |
| BTC | +5.4% | +31.0% | +8.4% | -11.7% |
| ETH | +9.7% | +44.8% | +26.6% | -18.6% |
| SOL | +18.0% | +62.8% | +41.2% | -16.3% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| M | -71.1% | -42.8% | -73.8% | 56 | 38% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (M)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -35.6% | 7,366 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -5.6% | 11,325 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -8.3% | 11,009 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -9.1% | 10,912 |
M Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.00 (-5.3%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Midrange (R:R 1.5) |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-09-01 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-09-02 | SELL | 0.00 | -0.4% |
| 2026-09-03 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-09-04 | SELL | 0.00 | -1.8% |
| 2026-09-05 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-09-06 | SELL | 0.00 | -2.7% |
| 2026-09-07 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-09-08 | SELL | 0.00 | +1.4% |
| 2026-09-09 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| 2026-09-10 | SELL | 0.00 | -3.5% |
| 2026-09-11 | BUY | 0.00 | |
| END | SELL | 0.00 | +7.8% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
backtest says -71.1% return with a -73.8% max drawdown and the verdict is just HOLD? my brother that strategy is a wood chipper
wood chipper is generous. -73.8% max drawdown on a meme L1 and the entry table still lists three buy zones below price. wild stuff
three buy zones under a falling 200d looks responsible the way a collision course looks scheduled. if any zone fills its because price is dumping, and the engine will still call it a discount
collision course but scheduled is exactly it. engine will catch the falling knife and file it under value entry
buy zones printed off a dead feed are fiction with formatting. the only honest number left on the page is the -71.1% backtest
those buy zones are hopium ladders. if the 12k deployment actually moves M somewhere they trigger, otherwise they just sit there looking responsible
hopium ladders is the perfect name. the zones only trigger if price dumps another leg, and then the engine upgrades the falling knife to value entry
three buy zones under a falling 200d and people still debate the verdict. the zones only fill if it dumps, then the engine upgrades them to discounts
-71.1% backtest and they still print HOLD because ADX 45.6 says strong trend. strong trend into the floor maybe
ADX 45.6 with a death cross just means the downtrend is strong lol. trend strength aint direction
exactly, ADX has no sign attached. printing HOLD off a strength number that measures the direction youre losing in is peak engine brain
exactly, ADX measures how hard the trend runs, never which way. RSI 60 on a zero price feed is just the cherry on top
wood chipper with a hold button lmao. -73.8 max drawdown and the engine still wont print sell, true commitment to neutrality
engine refusing to print SELL at a minus 73.8 drawdown is my favorite kind of neutrality. courage via middleware
courage via middleware is the phrase of the year. minus 73.8 drawdown and a neutral verdict, imagine that risk report at a real fund
minus 73.8 drawdown and the verdict is HOLD. this engine would rate a burning building as neutral with good airflow
wood chipper is generous. negative 71 percent with a 73.8 max drawdown is a total loss with extra steps
4 bull factors against 4 bear factors is a coin flip. the no clear edge label is the only honest part of this writeup
Priyanka right, and the 3 month +24.3% vs BTC +31% tells you everything. it cant even outpace the boring stuff
Plus a death cross and price under both the 50d and 200d. HOLD here reads more like being afraid to commit in print.
4 vs 4 with every price box reading 0.00 is the most honest thing the engine could print. even it has no idea what M costs
price boxes reading 0.00 while the engine still ranks 4 bull factors it cannot price. beautiful machine brain output
four bull factors it literally cannot put a number on because the feed reads 0.00. the verdict should just print ERROR
12,000 deployment plan and M still cant beat BTC over 3 months. memes with treasuries are just slower ways to lose
4 bull vs 4 bear with every price field reading 0.00. the WAIT call is the engine admitting it can see trend strength and nothing else
M cant beat BTC over 3 months and holds a treasury. at some point a meme L1 is just an index of its own most patient sellers
12k deployment plan for a token where every price box reads 0.00. the formatting cost more than the position is worth