Maker (MKR)
1362.66
2903.66
-53.1%
Stage 4 (Downtrend)
Bullish factors: strong bull trend (ADX 35.3)
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, MACD bear cross, falling 1m & 3m, far below high, vol 1.39x on down day, distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.69)
Low: 837.03
Now: 1362.66
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 45.1 | ADX (14) | 35.3 |
| 50d MA | 1420.42 | 200d MA | 1602.52 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 1150.27 | Resistance | 1714.17 |
| ATR Volatility | 15.21%/day | Trend | SELL |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| MKR | -2.7% | -20.3% | -22.7% | -22.8% |
| BTC | +1.0% | -16.4% | -9.3% | -30.5% |
| ETH | +7.5% | -8.5% | -12.3% | -38.1% |
| SOL | -7.9% | -11.2% | -16.2% | -46.4% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 30,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| MKR | -67.2% | +34.1% | -67.7% | 77 | 43% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (MKR)
If you had deployed 30,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -22.8% | 18,900 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -25.9% | 22,222 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -23.0% | 23,115 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -19.0% | 24,286 |
MKR Deployment Plan — 30,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Marcus Reid (Long-term HODLer). If you’re managing a 30,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 4,500 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 948.25 (-30.4%) |
| Target 1 | 1984.00 (45.6%) |
| Target 2 | 2399.00 (76.1%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 8 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Long-term HODLer.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-03-22 | BUY | 1699.90 | |
| 2026-03-23 | SELL | 1756.15 | +3.3% |
| 2026-03-24 | BUY | 1758.87 | |
| 2026-03-25 | SELL | 1729.30 | -1.7% |
| 2026-03-26 | BUY | 1681.76 | |
| 2026-04-25 | SELL | 1771.75 | +5.4% |
| 2026-04-27 | BUY | 1998.29 | |
| 2026-04-29 | SELL | 1749.36 | -12.5% |
| 2026-05-09 | BUY | 1843.95 | |
| 2026-05-11 | SELL | 1768.91 | -4.1% |
| 2026-07-25 | BUY | 1457.35 | |
| 2026-07-26 | SELL | 1479.65 | +1.5% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
1 bull factor vs 9 bearish ones and ADX 35 on the bear side? thats not a sell signal thats a run-for-your-life signal
exactly, the rebrand chaos killed whatever momentum was left. OBV going down confirms it, smart money already exited
obv bleeding out since the sky announcement while governance keeps shipping votes nobody asked for. smart money left and left a note
votes nobody asked for is exactly it. newdao this, migration window that, holders just wanted the buyback treadmill to keep running
holders wanted buybacks and got governance homework instead. every new migration window is another chance to check the price and head for the door
null_ptr is right, 1 bull signal vs 9 bearish with ADX 35 isnt a sell recommendation its an evacuation notice
evacuation notice implies there is still an exit. this trade left the station at 2900, everything after is negotiating with the bag
MKR at 1362 is wild. was trading above 2900 less than a year ago. the Endgame/Sky transition really spooked everyone
MKR from 2900 to 1362 and the Endgame transition is still half baked. Klaas M called it, the Sky migration killed the premium
Still holding MKR from the 2400s and the Sky transition is the main reason. Nine bearish signals out of ten in this piece and honestly the chart said it months ago
oguzhan from 2400 the choice is average down or exit, holding out of spite is how bags turn into tombstones
One bullish signal against nine bearish with ADX at 35. Got out at 1500 and even that felt late after the Endgame mess
getting out at 1500 was disciplined. I told myself 1600 was my line and renegotiated with myself twice on the way down
meanwhile the protocol still prints surplus revenue and buys back mkr with it. the market is pricing the sky migration as permanent dilution and tuning out the cash flows
vault_refi_ buybacks with the sky token shower running at the same time is a leaky bucket. revenue is real, dilution is realer
emissions_auditor leaky bucket is exactly it. buybacks repurchase a fraction of what the sky faucet prints every month
leaky bucket is generous. printing sky to fund mkr buybacks is an ouroboros with a governance vote attached
buybacks funded by printing sky is dilution laundering. mkr holders get the dashboard trophy, the sky faucet gets the real flow
endgame_eeyore dilution laundering is the exact phrase. the buyback dashboard shows purchases, it just doesnt show the sky printer running behind the curtain
ouroboros is the word. buybacks funded by printing sky is just moving dilution one layer down where the dashboard cant see it
emissions_auditor leaky bucket framing finally explains why mkr bleeds while revenue looks fine. the faucet outruns the buyback by an order of magnitude
mkr at 1362 while the protocol keeps printing surplus for buybacks. the sky rebrand torched brand equity but nothing under the hood actually broke
the sky rebrand will be a business school case study. had the most recognized brand in defi and traded it for a word nobody searches
mkr at 1362 printing surplus while sky emissions drain it. the chart is arguing with the treasury and the chart is winning
held since 2200 and the sky rebrand is where i stopped averaging down. brand equity was the only moat maker had and they set it on fire voluntarily
Held from 2500 to 1450 telling myself the migration was a discount. The moment I stopped negotiating with the bag and just sold, sleep improved. Sometimes the exit is the thesis