MANTRA (OM)
0.06
9.04
-99.4%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, 50d rising, MACD+, RSI healthy (58.4), rising 1m & 3m, strong bull trend (ADX 34.0), accumulation (OBV up, vol ratio 1.35)
Bearish factors: death cross, far below high
Low: 0.01
Now: 0.06
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 58.4 | ADX (14) | 34.0 |
| 50d MA | 0.02 | 200d MA | 0.03 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 0.01 | Resistance | 0.07 |
| ATR Volatility | 46.6%/day | Trend | BUY |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| OM | +557.9% | +541.9% | +282.0% | -31.6% |
| BTC | +2.2% | -15.3% | -12.2% | -33.1% |
| ETH | +5.2% | -10.5% | -15.1% | -41.6% |
| SOL | -10.1% | -12.2% | -19.8% | -47.0% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| OM | -88.8% | -99.1% | -92.3% | 9 | 11% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (OM)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -31.6% | 2,540 |
| DCA — 4 buys | +79.7% | 21,560 |
| DCA — 6 buys | +116.6% | 25,989 |
| DCA — 12 buys | +85.3% | 22,238 |
OM Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.00 (-93.2%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Midrange (R:R 1.5) |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-01-09 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-01-10 | SELL | 0.08 | -0.3% |
| 2026-01-11 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-01-12 | SELL | 0.08 | -2.3% |
| 2026-01-13 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-01-14 | SELL | 0.08 | -2.4% |
| 2026-06-22 | BUY | 0.05 | |
| 2026-06-23 | SELL | 0.01 | -86.0% |
| 2026-07-11 | BUY | 0.06 | |
| 2026-07-12 | SELL | 0.05 | -5.6% |
| 2026-07-13 | BUY | 0.06 | |
| 2026-07-14 | SELL | 0.06 | -13.7% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
99.4% drawdown from the 52w high and the signal says BUY. i know trend following is mechanical but buying something that lost 99% feels like catching a knife in slow motion
dragmedian_ the OBV accumulation and ADX at 34 actually support the call though. this is bottom-of-the-cycle stuff, not random gambling
OM went from 9 dollars to 6 cents. you could 10x from here and still be down 90%. the RSI at 58 means nothing on a token thats been decimated
$9.04 to $0.06 is a 99.3% drawdown. calling BUY on something that lost 99% of its value takes serious conviction or serious cope
12k deployment on OM at 6 cents is a lottery ticket. if the RWA tokenization narrative comes back this could move 10x easily, if not it goes to zero
12k on a token down 99.4% from ath. the ADX at 34 says trend is forming but ive been in tokens that formed a trend at the bottom for years
8 bull factors 2 bear factors sounds great until you remember the 2 bear ones are death cross and 99% below ath lol
0.06 to 0.60 would be a 10x and still 93% below the 9.04 high. thats the math nobody wants to hear
drawdown_math_ 99.3 percent drawdown and you still have to respect the OBV accumulation signal. bottom fishers gonna bottom fish
OM at 0.06 with a 9.04 ath. even the ADX at 34 means trend strength not direction. could be trending toward zero just as easily