Celestia (TIA)
0.33
3.81
-91.3%
Stage 4 (Downtrend)
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, MACD-, RSI weak (37.4), falling 1m & 3m, far below high, distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.65)
Low: 0.00
Now: 0.33
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 37.4 | ADX (14) | 20.8 |
| 50d MA | 0.37 | 200d MA | 0.37 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.32 | Resistance | 0.42 |
| ATR Volatility | 6.12%/day | Trend | SELL |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| TIA | -12.7% | -29.4% | -1.1% | -57.2% |
| BTC | +0.1% | -16.4% | -9.4% | -30.7% |
| ETH | +6.3% | -9.2% | -12.0% | -37.8% |
| SOL | -9.3% | -12.5% | -17.7% | -46.5% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| TIA | -59.8% | +5115.5% | -60.9% | 17 | 41% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (TIA)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -57.2% | 2,124 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -46.5% | 6,421 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -42.4% | 6,907 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -36.5% | 7,619 |
TIA Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.29 (-12.2%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-05-24 | BUY | 0.41 | |
| 2026-05-25 | SELL | 0.47 | +14.0% |
| 2026-05-26 | BUY | 0.47 | |
| 2026-05-27 | SELL | 0.44 | -6.3% |
| 2026-06-16 | BUY | 0.40 | |
| 2026-06-17 | SELL | 0.39 | -2.8% |
| 2026-06-18 | BUY | 0.39 | |
| 2026-06-19 | SELL | 0.38 | -3.4% |
| 2026-07-05 | BUY | 0.40 | |
| 2026-07-06 | SELL | 0.38 | -3.4% |
| 2026-07-08 | BUY | 0.40 | |
| 2026-07-09 | SELL | 0.41 | +2.8% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
91% drawdown from the 52w high and theyre still calling it a sell lol. like yeah no kidding, the damage is done
modular data availability was the narrative in 2023 and now TIA is at 33 cents. bought the top of the hype, painful lesson
everyone was so certain modular DA would eat monolithic chains. TIA at 33 cents later and the narrative cycle moved on like none of it happened
Nuno F. the modular narrative cycle was brutal. everyone pivoted to modular DA as the future and now TIA is a third of its 52w high. rollups solved their own data layer and TIA holders paid for the R&D experiment
rollups leaned on eigenDA and their own data layers, so TIA got the hype while someone else collected the fees. 3.81 down to 0.33 is what a token without captive demand looks like
a SELL rating after a 91 percent drawdown is pure desk energy. where was this report when TIA was trading at 3 dollars and the thesis was actually testable
right. the same research desks published modular world domination pieces when TIA rode 3 dollars. research follows price, it never leads it
Every research desk is a momentum follower in a blazer. The sell call at 33 cents will age well if the unlock calendar finally exhausts and terribly if it already has
The SELL stamp only arrives after a 91% drawdown does the analysis for them. Where were these desks at 3 dollars, writing modular world domination pieces.
they were publishing modular thesis pieces at 3.81 with the same confidence. the rating is momentum with a letterhead
33 cents from 3.81 and the killer is demand never showed. rollups leaned on eigenDA or their own data layers while the TIA unlock schedule kept printing sell pressure into that hole
eigenDA absorbing the data flows was the real kill shot. celestia got priced as the only DA shop while rollups quietly built or rented their own
da_purist eigenDA is the quiet killer nobody talks about. TIA got the modular DA premium priced in at 3.81 while eigenlayer was already building the alternative for free. the market figured it out
also eth blobs got cheap enough that most rollups just stayed home. paying rent for DA when the L1 hands it out nearly free was always a hard sell
blobs staying cheap was the entire point of eip 4844 for ethereum. celestia got priced out of a market it basically invented
eigenda and cheap blobs killed the DA thesis, TIA unlocks finished the chart. two independent bear cases landing together is rare, the sell is late not wrong
nobody models the supply side. tia unlocks kept diluting holders the whole way down from 3.81, so even a decent demand call loses to relentless sell pressure. two years late but sure, print the sell rating
unlock_calendar the supply math is brutal, something like a fifth of float still locked while price is 91 percent off the top. support at 0.32 is one bad candle from gone
a fifth of float still locked at 91 percent down means the dilution isnt even done. support at 0.32 is a waiting room
Price at 0.33 with support at 0.32 and ADX barely above 20. The system is not hedging here, it is flat out saying the next leg decides whether 30 cents holds.
adx barely above 20 is not a trend signal on a token this thin. the next leg is one unlock announcement away, the indicators are decoration
research desks shorting a 91 percent drawdown is like closing the barn door after the horse moved provinces