Stellar (XLM)
0.19
0.63
-69.7%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, 50d rising, MACD bull cross, RSI healthy (57.0), rising 1m & 3m, strong bull trend (ADX 25.1), vol 1.37x on up day
Bearish factors: death cross, far below high
Low: 0.09
Now: 0.19
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 57.0 | ADX (14) | 25.1 |
| 50d MA | 0.18 | 200d MA | 0.18 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 0.17 | Resistance | 0.22 |
| ATR Volatility | 5.17%/day | Trend | BUY |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| XLM | +7.1% | +3.6% | +13.4% | -15.0% |
| BTC | +4.0% | +26.7% | -1.5% | -10.4% |
| ETH | +5.7% | +40.2% | +9.0% | -16.3% |
| SOL | +6.3% | +47.5% | +14.8% | -18.5% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 15,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| XLM | -26.6% | -15.0% | -41.6% | 52 | 42% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (XLM)
If you had deployed 15,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -15.0% | 7,429 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -14.6% | 12,803 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -7.7% | 13,842 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -4.9% | 14,266 |
XLM Deployment Plan — 15,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Tomas Novak (Momentum / Swing Trader). If you’re managing a 15,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,750 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.17 (-10.3%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Midrange (R:R 1.5) |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Momentum / Swing Trader.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-08-21 | BUY | 0.20 | |
| 2026-08-30 | SELL | 0.17 | -13.4% |
| 2026-09-07 | BUY | 0.19 | |
| 2026-09-10 | SELL | 0.17 | -9.8% |
| 2026-09-12 | BUY | 0.18 | |
| 2026-09-13 | SELL | 0.18 | -1.6% |
| 2026-09-14 | BUY | 0.19 | |
| 2026-09-15 | SELL | 0.18 | -7.9% |
| 2026-09-16 | BUY | 0.18 | |
| 2026-09-17 | SELL | 0.18 | -0.1% |
| 2026-09-18 | BUY | 0.19 | |
| END | SELL | 0.19 | +0.0% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
xlm at 3.6 percent in 3 months is brutal but the sim starting buys right before consolidation is classic bad luck timing. rerun from march and the table looks different
buying an asset 69% below its high because 8 of 10 indicators say so is exactly how i got my 2021 bags lol. GL tho
fair, but at 0.19 the downside is what, another retest of the range low? risk/reward ain’t terrible
2021 bags gang checking in. the difference is the entry, 0.19 post flush beats 0.55 euphoria. still sizing half tbh
The ADX at 25.1 is barely into trend territory. I’d want to see it hold above 30 before calling this Stage 2 with high conviction.
adx 25 with a fresh macd cross is literally how early trends start tho, waiting for 30 means you missed the first leg
by the time adx prints 30 youre buying the second leg. 25 is late-ish but its the only entry this system ever gets
second leg has better r:r if the trend survives tho. entry at 0.19 with the 52w high at 0.63, you are paying for the drawdown either way
Agree on the ADX. 25.1 barely clears the trend bar, id want to see 30 before anything gets a high conviction label. The sim drawdown says the same thing louder
the ADX point is fair but 25.1 is rising off a base, direction of travel matters more than the absolute number. still not defending 15k in one shot tho
15k became 11,013 in the sim and the verdict is still DEPLOY lol. respect for printing the table honestly at least
A 41.6% max drawdown over 2 years is brutal, but it did beat holding. XLM fell 15% in that same window, the bar was on the floor.
the sim going 15k to 11k and still printing DEPLOY is the most honest part of this whole page imo. most analysis pieces hide the drawdown table
printing the table is honest but a -26.6 percent sim next to a HIGH conviction label is still a wild combo. the system needs a filter for its own drawdowns
a drawdown filter would help but then you miss the recovery leg, which is where trend systems make the year. -26.6 is rent either way
printing the drawdown table is the honest part, most analysis pages would crop that out. still not parking 15k on one macd cross
11,013 is the worst window starting right at entry tho. the table shows the recovery leg is where the year gets made, you just have to survive the rent
+3.6% over 3 months while sol did 47.5% is rough, but ADX 25 with a fresh macd cross is the first decent setup xlm has had in a while
comparing xlm to sol is a weird flex, totally different liquidity universe. 3.6% in 3 months is bad against anything with volume tho
0.19 against a 52w high of 0.63 and the comments are fighting about macd crosses lol. i just want to know if the 15k sim ever accounted for a 40% drawdown year
it did, 41.6 percent max drawdown is literally row one of the table. whether the person clicking DEPLOY reads past row one is the actual risk
the sim did account for it, 41.6 max drawdown is right there in the table. whether your stomach accounts for it is a different question
8 of 10 indicators green and the sim still dipped to 11k, the real lesson is the 15k number is too big for one signal. 5k across three entries would sleep way better
splitting it 3 ways is the move, ran something similar on a different pair and the drawdown felt half as bad even if the math says otherwise. 5k chunks also let you bail on entry 2 if the trend dies
8 of 10 green and the sim still dipped to 11k, thats the part everyone skips. respect the honesty but im waiting for xlm to actually hold the entry zone before wiring anything