Zcash (ZEC)
828.12
880.26
-5.9%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, golden cross, 50d rising, MACD+, rising 1m & 3m, within 10% of high, strong bull trend (ADX 41.0), accumulation (OBV up, vol ratio 1.59)
Bearish factors: vol 1.45x on down day
Low: 24.51
Now: 828.12
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 73.5 | ADX (14) | 41.0 |
| 50d MA | 561.22 | 200d MA | 422.88 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 453.24 | Resistance | 880.26 |
| ATR Volatility | 6.3%/day | Trend | BUY |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| ZEC | +63.1% | +109.6% | +165.6% | +87.7% |
| BTC | +20.3% | +30.3% | +2.9% | -11.9% |
| ETH | +27.2% | +55.0% | +5.2% | -18.8% |
| SOL | +35.2% | +45.9% | +20.4% | -18.5% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| ZEC | +990.8% | +2315.5% | -56.7% | 63 | 49% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (ZEC)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | +87.7% | 248,336 |
| DCA — 4 buys | +595.7% | 83,485 |
| DCA — 6 buys | +439.9% | 64,789 |
| DCA — 12 buys | +357.0% | 54,834 |
ZEC Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 614.97 (-25.7%) |
| Target 1 | 958.00 (15.7%) |
| Target 2 | 1037.00 (25.2%) |
| Entry quality | Extended (R:R 0.73) |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-06-15 | BUY | 518.71 | |
| 2026-06-16 | SELL | 503.81 | -2.9% |
| 2026-07-15 | BUY | 570.28 | |
| 2026-07-28 | SELL | 465.44 | -18.4% |
| 2026-08-02 | BUY | 488.58 | |
| 2026-08-11 | SELL | 481.11 | -1.5% |
| 2026-08-12 | BUY | 489.77 | |
| 2026-08-15 | SELL | 487.45 | -0.5% |
| 2026-08-17 | BUY | 514.27 | |
| 2026-08-21 | SELL | 732.77 | +42.5% |
| 2026-08-25 | BUY | 767.95 | |
| END | SELL | 828.12 | +7.8% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
rsi 73 and adx 41 and the system still says buy. trend followers gonna trend follow i guess. that 377.90 backtest entry is the part that hurts
backtest bought at 377 and now its a buy at 828 with R:R 0.61. system says buy, the math says wait for a pullback to the 50d at 561
561 is a 32% haircut from here, if that ever fills the system would probably flip to WAIT anyway. splitting entry half now half at the 50d seems like the only sane compromise
561 is a 32% haircut tho. splitting half now half at the 50d is the only version of this that survives being wrong twice
splitting half at 828 half at 561 is just admitting the signal is a coin flip at this r:r. fine strategy, weird to print it as a BUY
splitting entries is fine but the 50d at 561 hasnt been tagged since the july break. waiting for it means the fill never happens and you end up chasing at 880
system says BUY at 828 with RSI already 73.5. and the fine print admits buy and hold did +2315% while the strategy did +990%. im good lol
yeah but nobody survives the -56.7% max drawdown on live money, that part matters
+2315% buy and hold vs +990% for the strategy and people still deploy 12k on the signal. the fine print is doing heavy lifting here
+2315 vs +990 is the trend-following deal in one number. you pay 60 percent of the upside to skip the -56% winters. most of us cant stomach either side
the 2315 vs 990 comparison only counts if you held from 24.51. anyone who entered ZEC above 400 is underwater on that math, survivorship bias dressed as fine print
the 24.51 baseline is doing all the work in that comparison. enter at 400 and the strategy versus holding is a tie with extra steps
from 24.51 to 828 in a year and people are still calling privacy coins dead. ZEC up 165% over 6 months while ETH sits at +5%
look at the trade log first. four chop losses in a row in July, then one +42.5% catch on aug 21 paid for everything. trend following is pain tolerance math
four chop losses in july and people still expect the aug 21 catch to repeat on cue. the math only works if you can sit through the next -56% like Dana said
A 22.3% stop on a 3,750 position is real conviction. Either you trust stage 2 trends or you don’t, half sizing this defeats the point.
880 high with only a -5.9% drawdown, zec has barely dipped. why chase, wait for the retest
vol 1.45x on the one down day is literally the entire bear column. everything else on this sheet says stage 2 continuation, 880 is the last gate
828 on a 73 RSI and the debate is still position sizing lol. the 561 stop is the only honest number on this whole page
finally someone mentions the rsi. 73.5 at a fresh BUY is the kind of thing you screenshot for the group chat later
R:R 0.61 on a fresh BUY is the whole argument against taking this signal at 828. cool system, wrong zip code for an entry
r:r 0.61 is the system admitting the entry looks bad too. trend entries always price terrible at the breakout, thats the tax for riding stage 2
0.61 is ugly but stage 2 never gives pretty entries. either pay the breakout tax or miss the leg, no third option on ZEC
everyone arguing entries while the 50d at 561 sits 32 percent below. split or wait, full size at 828 after a 165 percent run is donating
828 with a 22 percent stop means risking 825 to make 500 on the first target. love the privacy thesis but thats retail pricing for a coin the backtest bought at 377