POL (ex-MATIC) (POL)
0.01
0.34
-97.3%
Stage 4 (Downtrend)
Bullish factors: MACD+, strong bull trend (ADX 97.5), vol 2.09x on up day
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, falling 1m & 3m, far below high, distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.12)
Low: 0.01
Now: 0.01
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 48.1 | ADX (14) | 97.5 |
| 50d MA | 0.02 | 200d MA | 0.04 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.01 | Resistance | 0.08 |
| ATR Volatility | 367.36%/day | Trend | SELL |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| POL | -2.5% | -24.0% | -49.1% | -65.7% |
| BTC | +9.8% | +32.3% | +8.8% | -9.5% |
| ETH | +11.4% | +44.4% | +21.8% | -17.2% |
| SOL | +15.4% | +52.8% | +30.5% | -18.2% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 35,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| POL | -100.0% | -97.1% | -100.0% | 66 | 17% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (POL)
If you had deployed 35,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -65.7% | 3,284 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -79.6% | 7,151 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -77.1% | 8,020 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -70.1% | 10,473 |
POL Deployment Plan — 35,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Oliver Schmidt (Conservative / Institutional). If you’re managing a 35,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 5,250 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | -0.06 (-732.7%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 10 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Conservative / Institutional.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-07-25 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-07-26 | SELL | 0.01 | -85.0% |
| 2026-07-31 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-01 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.1% |
| 2026-08-02 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-03 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.9% |
| 2026-08-14 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-15 | SELL | 0.08 | +0.0% |
| 2026-08-30 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-31 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.9% |
| 2026-09-01 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-09-02 | SELL | 0.01 | -88.4% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
adx 97.5 on a coin doing 0.01 with 367% daily volatility, that reading is basically noise. SELL is the only sane output here
Agreed, and with 367% daily vol the death cross barely matters either. one green candle erases the whole pattern
one green candle erasing the pattern goes both ways though, at 0.01 a double is still just 0.02. what matters more is that there were 66 trades to draw a death cross from at all
backtest went to literally zero, -100%, final value 0. this thing is a case study in why stop losses exist
17% win rate across 66 trades is almost impressive. takes dedication to a strategy to keep firing after -87% losses three times in a row
17% win rate across 66 trades and it still found 11 that worked. survivorship bias with a chart attached
final value literally zero and the engine still ran all 66 trades. whoever built that backtester never heard of a kill switch
no kill switch on a backtester running a coin to literal zero is unhinged. even a floor at -90 would have spared us the 0.00 targets
a backtest that cannot stop at -90 is wild, but honestly the zero is the honest output. any floor would just be cosplaying a risk model on a coin that went -97
-97.3% from the 0.34 high and people are still mapping resistance at 0.08 like it matters. copium of the highest grade
both profit targets literally 0.00 lmao, even the engine gave up on this one. rip MATIC bagholders, me included
both targets at 0.00 lmao, the engine filed a resignation letter. held from the MATIC days too, we ride to zero or we ride to relevance
the agglayer thesis needs adoption that has not shown up yet. i stopped averaging down at 0.02 and the SELL tag just confirmed what the tape said all year
we ride to zero or we ride to relevance is the most honest thing written about POL all year. unfortunately in the same boat since the 0.89 migration
resistance at 0.08 on a coin trading 0.01 is an 8x away. whoever drew those levels was charting a different coin entirely
8x away to resistance and both profit targets literally print 0.00. even the engine is just politely pointing at the exit
8x to mapped resistance and the engine still printed targets at 0.00. whoever built that backtester owes us an apology and a kill switch
held MATIC since 2021, watched it become POL at 0.01. -97.3% off the high. this article is just salt in the wound tbh
same, converted at the migration and told myself it was a tax play. it was not a tax play
resistance mapped at 0.08 on a coin sitting at 0.01 after sliding -97.3% from 0.34. whoever is still swinging POL needs this SELL tag more than most
watched matic at 2 dollars relabel itself into POL at one cent. at some point a SELL tag on a -97% chart is just a eulogy
polygon shipped the zk pivot, the agg layer, the whole roadmap. tech can win while the token eats dirt, this chart is the receipt
mapped resistance sitting 8x above spot on a 0.01 coin. the SELL tag is doing charity work for anyone still averaging down into POL
a 35k deployment plan against a SELL tag where both targets print zero. the honest advice was one line, dont. everything after that is decoration
17 percent win rate over 66 trades and the SELL tag still feels generous. stopped averaging down at 0.02 and my sleep improved immediately