📈 Get daily crypto insights that make you smarter about your money

Ryan Coffey Files Class Action Against Ripple Labs in Never-Ending ICO Lawsuit

The Hook

Just days after Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger delivered their scathing verdict on cryptocurrency, another major development hit the crypto regulatory landscape on May 5, 2018. Disgruntled XRP investor Ryan Coffey filed a class action lawsuit against Ripple Labs Inc., accusing the San Francisco-based company of running a “never-ending ICO” by selling XRP tokens that he claims are unregistered securities. The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco Superior Court on May 3, 2018, represents one of the most significant regulatory challenges to emerge for any major cryptocurrency in 2018.

On-Chain Evidence

CoinMarketCap data shows the cryptocurrency market cap at $164.3 billion on May 5, 2018, with Bitcoin at $9,654.80 and Ethereum at $792.31. Kraken Digital Asset Exchange reported $215 million in total daily trading volume, with XRP experiencing significant volatility amid the legal proceedings. The timing of the lawsuit coincided with growing regulatory scrutiny across the crypto sector as authorities worldwide sought to establish clearer frameworks for digital asset oversight.

The Core Conflict

The lawsuit alleges that Ripple has violated both California Corporations Code and US Securities Act by conducting what the complaint describes as “never-ending ICO” sales. According to court documents, Coffey purchased 650 XRP tokens at approximately $2.60 each on January 6, 2018, totaling around $1,690. Just twelve days later on January 18, 2018, he traded all his XRP for the equivalent of $1,105 in Tether dollars, resulting in a net loss of approximately $550. The complaint claims Ripple “consistently portrayed XRP as a good investment, relayed optimistic price predictions, and conflated Ripple Labs’ enterprise customers with usage of XRP.”

Market Implications

The legal proceedings initiated by Johnson Fistel, LLP on behalf of the class revealed that Ripple had earned “massive profits by quietly selling off this XRP to the general public…in order to increase demand for XRP, and thereby increase the profits it can derive by selling XRP.” The lawsuit sought class action status for all entities who purchased XRP after January 1, 2013. This case emerged amid broader regulatory uncertainty in the crypto space, where different authorities offered conflicting interpretations of whether cryptocurrencies constitute securities.

The Verdict

Ripple executives remained defiant throughout the legal proceedings, with Ripple’s chief market strategist Cory Johnson publicly asserting that XRP is “absolutely not a security.” However, the lawsuit gained additional credibility when Gary Gensler, former CFTC chairman, stated that he would classify XRP tokens as “non-compliant securities” due to Ripple’s centralized distributed model. The case represents a critical moment in the ongoing debate about cryptocurrency regulation and raises fundamental questions about how emerging digital assets fit within traditional financial frameworks.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and involve significant risk. Always conduct your own research before investing.

🌱 FOR BUSINESSES BitcoinsNews.com
Reach 100K+ Crypto Readers
Sponsored content, press releases, banner ads, and newsletter placements. Put your brand in front of Bitcoin's most engaged audience.

7 thoughts on “Ryan Coffey Files Class Action Against Ripple Labs in Never-Ending ICO Lawsuit”

  1. coffey filed this in state court to avoid the feds. smart lawyering but ultimately the SEC took over and made it way bigger than this ever was

    1. right, this case basically got absorbed into the bigger SEC v Ripple fight. coffey was early though, gotta give him that

  2. never-ending ICO is actually the most accurate description of ripple’s business model ive ever seen

    1. never-ending ICO is generous. they printed tokens out of thin air and sold them for years while claiming decentralization. the coffey case just said it out loud first

      1. they escrowed 55 billion XRP and released a billion a month from it. if that is not an ongoing token sale then what is

  3. Coffey lost money on XRP and decided to sue instead of just selling. say what you want about the case but the man had conviction

  4. Coffey filed in state court to keep it out of federal hands. ultimately the SEC made the whole thing moot but the legal strategy was clever

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BTC$66,521.00+3.5%ETH$1,774.89+6.5%SOL$72.76+7.4%BNB$622.70+1.9%XRP$1.24+9.0%ADA$0.1879+11.7%DOGE$0.0900+4.1%DOT$1.03+6.3%AVAX$6.93+4.9%LINK$8.34+5.8%UNI$2.69+7.0%ATOM$2.02+4.8%LTC$45.83+4.3%ARB$0.0883+6.3%NEAR$2.47+18.2%FIL$0.8148+6.3%SUI$0.8131+7.6%BTC$66,521.00+3.5%ETH$1,774.89+6.5%SOL$72.76+7.4%BNB$622.70+1.9%XRP$1.24+9.0%ADA$0.1879+11.7%DOGE$0.0900+4.1%DOT$1.03+6.3%AVAX$6.93+4.9%LINK$8.34+5.8%UNI$2.69+7.0%ATOM$2.02+4.8%LTC$45.83+4.3%ARB$0.0883+6.3%NEAR$2.47+18.2%FIL$0.8148+6.3%SUI$0.8131+7.6%
Scroll to Top