A new survey of two hundred financial executives reveals that eighty-four percent of financial institutions now consider tokenization a strategic priority — and the race to bring real-world assets onto blockchains is no longer experimental. It is mainstream.
By Yasmin Al-Rashid | July 18, 2026
The Hook: A Survey That Could Have Been Written by Crypto Optimists
For years, blockchain enthusiasts have promised that tokenization — the process of representing ownership of real assets like stocks, bonds, and real estate as digital tokens on a blockchain — would transform finance. Wall Street nodded politely and ran small pilots. That patience is ending.
Financial technology provider Broadridge surveyed two hundred North American financial services executives and found that eighty-four percent now view tokenization as important to their business. Sixty-eight percent believe tokenization will at least partially reshape financial markets within the next three to five years. Nearly one-third plan to increase investment in tokenization projects by twenty-six to fifty percent or more over the next two years, according to the survey reported by CoinDesk.
This is not a crypto trade association pushing a narrative. Broadridge is one of the largest financial technology providers in the world, processing trillions of dollars in transactions annually for banks, broker-dealers, and asset managers. When Broadridge says the industry is moving, the industry is moving.
On-Chain Evidence: DTCC Goes Live While Wall Street Watches
The survey results landed the same week as a milestone that would have seemed improbable a year ago. On July 15, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation — the organization that settles essentially every stock trade in the United States — completed its first live production trades involving tokenized securities. DTCC is not a crypto company. It is the backbone of the traditional financial system, and it just brought blockchain technology into live trading.
That follows months of acceleration from the biggest names in finance. BlackRock’s tokenized Treasury fund has grown into one of the largest blockchain-based investment funds in existence. Franklin Templeton offers tokenized money market funds. JPMorgan has expanded blockchain-based settlement through its Kinexys platform. Visa and DTCC are both building infrastructure to support tokenized payments and securities.
The Broadridge survey quantified what these individual moves suggest: the industry is moving beyond experimentation and into production. Key findings include:
- Capital markets firms lead adoption — forty-four percent already have tokenization initiatives in production or operating at scale
- Asset managers lag — only twenty percent have reached production, while wealth managers are further behind at nine percent
- Tokenized funds expected to lead — about eighty percent of respondents believe tokenized mutual funds and money market funds will play a meaningful role within five years
- Tokenized equities trail — only about half expect tokenized stocks to achieve similar adoption in that timeframe
The Core Conflict: Hybrid Future or Full Onchain Revolution?
One of the most striking findings from the Broadridge survey is what financial firms are not planning. Despite all the hype about putting everything on a blockchain, ninety-two percent of respondents expect digital and traditional assets to coexist for the foreseeable future. Sixty-nine percent plan to integrate tokenization into their existing infrastructure rather than build separate blockchain-native systems.
In plain English: Wall Street does not want to replace the current system. It wants to bolt blockchain onto it. That is a significant departure from the original crypto vision of decentralized finance replacing banks entirely. Instead, banks are adopting the parts of blockchain technology that save them money — faster settlement, lower operational costs, easier division of assets into smaller pieces — while keeping control of the infrastructure.
This creates an interesting tension. Crypto purists see tokenization as a halfway house — a watered-down version of what blockchain was supposed to deliver. Banks see it as an upgrade to plumbing that was designed decades ago. Both can be right. The question is whether hybrid systems eventually evolve into something more decentralized, or whether Wall Street simply absorbs the useful parts of blockchain and discards the rest.
Market Implications: What This Means for Investors
For regular investors, the tokenization shift matters in several concrete ways.
First, it means more investment products accessible in smaller increments. When a Treasury bill or a money market fund is tokenized, you can buy a fraction of it instead of needing the large minimum investments that traditional finance often requires. That is the “divisibility” benefit of tokenization — and survey respondents expect tokenized mutual funds and money market funds to be among the first products to scale.
Second, it means faster settlement. Traditional stock trades take one business day to settle (the T+1 standard that was only adopted in 2024). Tokenized securities can settle in minutes or even seconds. That reduces counterparty risk — the danger that one party defaults before the trade completes.
Third, it means more competition among infrastructure providers. If settlement moves to blockchain rails, companies that earn fees from clearing and custody face pressure. That is partly why DTCC is moving aggressively — it would rather disrupt itself than be disrupted.
But the survey also highlighted obstacles. Regulatory uncertainty ranked as the most commonly cited challenge, followed by the operational complexity of integrating blockchain into existing systems. Those barriers explain why adoption remains uneven — capital markets firms with sophisticated technology teams are moving ahead, while smaller wealth managers are still watching from the sidelines.
The Verdict: The Pipeline Is Bigger Than the Headlines
Bitcoin is trading around sixty-four thousand six hundred dollars and ether around one thousand eight hundred fifty-six dollars, but the real story for long-term investors is not the daily price swings. It is the infrastructure being quietly built underneath.
When eighty-four percent of financial institutions say tokenization is a strategic priority, and the DTCC is running live tokenized trades, the writing is on the wall. The financial system five years from now will look different from the one we have today — not because crypto replaced banks, but because banks adopted the technology that crypto pioneered.
For investors, the takeaway is this: pay attention to the infrastructure layer, not just the token prices. The companies building the rails for tokenized securities — whether they are crypto-native or traditional fintech — are positioning themselves for a multi-trillion-dollar shift. And the institutions moving now are the ones likely to define how digital assets fit into everyday investing.
The cryptocurrency market remains highly volatile. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry risk; always do your own research.
84% of execs say tokenization is strategic yet like 3 firms actually shipped anything beyond a pilot. survey season is the new farming season
DTCC doing live tokenized trades is the real story here. survey numbers are whatever but actual settlement on chain is huge
@tokenize_this_ exactly. broadridge processing trillions already so when they move its not pilot anymore its infrastructure shift
the DTCC piece people undersell is intraday collateral mobility. moving collateral in hours instead of T+1 frees billions in buffer. that is where the actual savings live, the survey fluff is marketing
collateral mobility is the one use case with a clean before and after number. everything else in these surveys is vibes with a compliance budget
grease_the_wheel_ intraday collateral mobility is the actual unlock. T+1 repo costs banks billions in idle capital. tokenizing that process frees real money not survey hype
Broadridge running this survey is not exactly neutral. they sell tokenization infrastructure. of course their clients say its a priority
^ good point but even accounting for vendor bias, 200 execs is a real sample size. blackrock pushing buidl is what changed the conversation
84% of execs saying its a strategic priority and yet most of them probably couldnt explain what a token actually does. surveyed the wrong people imo
68% already have live programs? color me skeptical. define live. a 50k pilot on polygon testnet probably counts lol
the follow up nobody runs: ask those 68% for settlement volume by chain. dead silence every time. a testnet transfer and a live DvP trade both count as a live program in these surveys
Broadridge running the survey about tokenization adoption while selling tokenization infrastructure is a conflict of interest nobody mentions
Lars M. vendor surveys always skew optimistic but DTCC doing actual tokenized settlement is the signal not the survey numbers
Lars M. Broadridge running the survey while selling tokenization infra is textbook vendor bias. but even discounting 30% of the numbers its still a massive shift
84% call it strategic, 68% claim live programs. The missing stat is how many settle over 10M a day. My guess is single digits.
single digits is generous. most live programs are one treasury bill pilot and a dashboard. the survey counts intent, the ledger counts volume
the 10M a day question would end so many press releases. under five firms globally clearing that bar on public chains is my estimate
68% live programs and SettlementStan is right, ask for volume. my bank’s ‘live program’ is a quarterly testnet transfer of $50k. technically live, functionally nothing
200 executives and nobody mentions the legal wrapper problem. a tokenized treasury bill is still a security, transfer restrictions live in the token, and every pilot quietly drowns in compliance logic
200 executives describing their own industry transformation is basically a mood ring. broadridge running the poll while selling the rails is the detail that should anchor every percentage here
Annelien V. the bias argument is fair but DTCC settling tokenized treasuries live on chain is the rebuttal. you can’t vendor-bias a production settlement system
DTCC running live settlement is real but its one rails operator moving its own paper. survey counts 200 firms dreaming, the ledger counts maybe five shipping
audit_fax_ the DTCC moving its own paper is exactly how infrastructure shifts start. swift did not onboard competitors on day one either
84% strategic priority but ask what it displaced in the budget. tokenization pilots are the new cloud migration decks, everyone has one, nobody shipped
everyone asks the 84% for settlement volume and nobody asks broadridge how many of the 200 execs are already clients. both numbers deserve the same skepticism
chain_gnp_ the client overlap question is the one to ask. broadridge surveys its own customer base, so the 84 percent is partly vendor lock in doing the talking