Pyth Network (PYTH)
0.04
0.55
-92.6%
Stage 3 (Topping)
Bullish factors: 50d rising, strong bull trend (ADX 33.4)
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, MACD-, RSI weak (41.8), far below high
Low: 0.03
Now: 0.04
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 41.8 | ADX (14) | 33.4 |
| 50d MA | 0.04 | 200d MA | 0.05 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.04 | Resistance | 0.05 |
| ATR Volatility | 6.59%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| PYTH | -5.9% | +2.7% | -5.3% | -49.1% |
| BTC | +3.2% | -13.6% | -8.9% | -25.9% |
| ETH | +9.7% | -5.5% | -11.0% | -32.5% |
| SOL | -5.3% | -10.5% | -18.0% | -44.8% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 35,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| PYTH | -67.6% | -82.3% | -68.1% | 35 | 26% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (PYTH)
If you had deployed 35,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -49.1% | 11,865 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -44.5% | 19,427 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -33.8% | 23,158 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -32.9% | 23,491 |
PYTH Deployment Plan — 35,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Oliver Schmidt (Conservative / Institutional). If you’re managing a 35,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 5,250 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.04 (-13.2%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 10 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Conservative / Institutional.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-07-18 | BUY | 0.05 | |
| 2026-07-19 | SELL | 0.05 | -0.3% |
| 2026-07-20 | BUY | 0.05 | |
| 2026-07-21 | SELL | 0.05 | -0.8% |
| 2026-07-22 | BUY | 0.05 | |
| 2026-07-23 | SELL | 0.05 | -5.4% |
| 2026-07-24 | BUY | 0.04 | |
| 2026-07-25 | SELL | 0.04 | -3.2% |
| 2026-07-26 | BUY | 0.04 | |
| 2026-07-27 | SELL | 0.04 | +1.5% |
| 2026-07-29 | BUY | 0.04 | |
| END | SELL | 0.04 | +0.0% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
92% down from ATH and they call it HOLD? the 50d is above price, death cross in effect, RSI at 41. this is a falling knife
node_shepherd_ exactly. calling -92% a HOLD because ADX shows strong downtrend is wild copium
node_shepherd_ calling a 92% drawdown a HOLD because ADX shows strong downtrend is next level copium. just admit youre bagholding
ADX at 33.4 is the only bullish signal here and even that is just saying the downtrend is strong lol. pyth oracle fees cant sustain this price
^ exactly. strong ADX just means the dump has conviction. holding through -92% hoping for a miracle is not a strategy
onchain_giraffe_ holding through -92% is not conviction its just being stubborn. cut and rotate into something with actual momentum
feed_latency_ Pyth pulled ahead of Chainlink on Solana deployment volume and still got dumped. oracle tokenomics are fundamentally broken, nobody wants to hold data feed tokens
Mateusz W. Pyth beat Chainlink on Solana deployment volume and still got dumped 92%. oracle tokens are fundamentally uninvestable
$0.04 with a 52W high of $0.55. 92% drawdown on an oracle network that actually has real integrations. the market is pricing Pyth like its going to zero
PYTH at 0.04 down from 0.55. oracle networks with real integrations trading like theyre going to zero. the tokenomics model is fundamentally broken
delist_kep_ pyth beat chainlink on solana deployment volume and still tanked. oracle tokens are a value trap, users dont need to hold the token
calling a 92% drawdown a HOLD because ADX shows strong trend is peak copium. just say you bagheld and go
the feeds come from jane street, jump and wintermute because better oracles mean better fills for them. nobody in that loop needs to buy PYTH, the token is basically a thank you card
PYTH at $0.04 down from $0.55 with real oracle integrations. the token captures zero fee revenue from data feeds. holders are donating to the ecosystem
chainlink shipped staking to give the token some claim on fees, pyth has nothing equivalent for retail yet. until a fee switch exists the token is pure narrative exposure to oracle volume
chainlink staking mostly acts as slashing insurance for node operators anyway. pyth needs its own version fast, entitlement revenue goes to the company while holders get narrative
the HOLD tracks the 50d, its a trend rule people keep misreading as a valuation call. RSI 41 with ADX 33 says the downtrend still has legs, trimming into bounces seems obvious
ADX 33 on a token that rounds to 4 cents. charting at that resolution is astrology, the 0.55 to 0.04 path says supply overhang and the trend lines are decoration
astrology is generous. a 0.55 to 0.04 chart already tells you everything ADX claims to. one supply overhang headline erases six weeks of trend talk
held pyth since airdrop, sold most around 0.30 and im still annoyed. the data business is real, the token thesis never showed up
0.30 exit aged like fine wine. clip and forget was the correct play on this one
0.30 was disciplined, most airdrop recipients rode it straight down praying for a fee switch. the data side printing revenue while the token bleeds is the cleanest decoupling out there
rode it from 0.30 to 0.04 and still posting bull flags. sunk cost on an airdrop bag is a special kind of coping
HOLD at 4 cents says nothing. the only question is whether publisher fees ever accrue to the token, until that is answered every rating is vibes on a 92 percent drawdown
publisher fees are the one thing actually working at pyth tho. data providers get paid real money, that’s why feeds stay live even at -92% from the high