Wormhole (W)
0.01
0.41
-97.9%
Stage 4 (Downtrend)
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, RSI weak (37.1), falling 1m & 3m, far below high, distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.68)
Low: 0.01
Now: 0.01
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 37.1 | ADX (14) | 15.4 |
| 50d MA | 0.01 | 200d MA | 0.02 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.01 | Resistance | 0.01 |
| ATR Volatility | 5.67%/day | Trend | SELL |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| W | -11.3% | -28.7% | -50.2% | -82.8% |
| BTC | +3.2% | -13.6% | -8.9% | -25.9% |
| ETH | +9.7% | -5.5% | -11.0% | -32.5% |
| SOL | -5.3% | -10.5% | -18.0% | -44.8% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 30,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| W | -28.5% | -95.4% | -43.0% | 13 | 54% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (W)
If you had deployed 30,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -82.8% | 3,138 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -69.9% | 9,032 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -67.9% | 9,623 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -63.4% | 10,970 |
W Deployment Plan — 30,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Marcus Reid (Long-term HODLer). If you’re managing a 30,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 4,500 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 0.01 (-11.4%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 8 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Long-term HODLer.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2025-05-27 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| 2025-05-28 | SELL | 0.10 | -1.2% |
| 2025-05-29 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| 2025-05-30 | SELL | 0.08 | -16.1% |
| 2025-09-11 | BUY | 0.10 | |
| 2025-09-12 | SELL | 0.09 | -1.0% |
| 2025-09-13 | BUY | 0.09 | |
| 2025-09-14 | SELL | 0.09 | -3.7% |
| 2025-09-16 | BUY | 0.09 | |
| 2025-09-17 | SELL | 0.10 | +11.1% |
| 2025-09-19 | BUY | 0.11 | |
| 2025-10-10 | SELL | 0.08 | -31.9% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
-97.9% from high and still SELL? brutal but honest. wormhole had that $320M hack in 2022 and never recovered trust
bridge_burner_ the 97.9% drawdown from ATH is actually impressive. most projects would have rugged before reaching that level of capitulation
and jump had to backfill the 120k eth out of pocket to keep weth solvent. bridge trust never came back from that regardless of who paid the bill
0 bull factors out of 8. zero. OBV trending down, volume ratio 0.68. nobody is buying this and they shouldnt
wormhole at $0.01 is basically a penny stock at this point. RSI 37 and still falling, no floor in sight
gas_panda_ calling it a penny stock is generous. penny stocks at least have SEC filings. W has a 320M hack and -97.9% drawdown
penny stock comparison is brutal but accurate. those companies at least file quarterly reports lol
Kenji W. 0 bull factors is harsh but accurate. W at $0.01 with RSI still falling means even the bottom-fishers are getting schooled
from 0.41 to 0.01 and the telegram is still posting final accumulation zone. every dead token has that one guy
that one guy is basically the last market maker lol. remove his daily accumulation post and the volume ratio drops from 0.68 to nothing
if one accumulation poster is the market maker the honest ticker is W slash illiquid. might as well quote it OTC
0 bull factors out of 8 is brutal but honest. Wormhole never recovered from the $320M bridge hack and the tokenomics confirm it
OBV trending down with volume ratio 0.68 means the only buyers are bag holders averaging down. nobody new is entering W
volume ratio 0.68 confirms what everyone already knows. the only people still trading W are bagholders dollar cost averaging into a grave
the volume ratio of 0.68 is generous tbh. most of the buy volume is just bagholders rotating between their own wallets
the self transfer thing is real. watched a wallet do a 40k buy and route it back to itself two blocks later. volume ratio should come with an asterisk
the self transfer crowd is why i stopped trusting volume on small caps entirely. one aggressive wash bot can double the ratio on a dead token for pocket change
97.9pct drawdown and still negative volume ratio. the chart is a textbook distribution into zero. W is done
Textbook distribution needs someone left to buy the bags. When support and resistance both sit at 0.01 there is barely a market left to distribute into.
0.01 floor and ceiling at the same time, brutal way to learn that 97.9 percent drawdowns dont mean cheap. distribution needs buyers and there are none left
52 week high 0.41, now 0.01. every support on the way down got called accumulation, it was exit liquidity leaving in stages
0.68 volume ratio at 0.01 means the spread eats any thesis before entry. whats left trading is bagholders rotating bags between their own wallets
spread plus the 120k eth backfill memory means nothing institutional touches this bridge token. the sell call is late but not wrong
volume ratio 0.68 with half of it self transfers. W is two bagholders and one accumulation poster taking turns providing liquidity to each other
two wallets and one accumulation poster taking turns providing liquidity to each other might be the saddest order book on chain. even the exit needs an audience nobody is providing