POL (ex-MATIC) (POL)
0.01
0.34
-97.5%
Stage 4 (Downtrend)
Bullish factors: strong bull trend (ADX 97.0)
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, MACD-, falling 1m & 3m, far below high, vol 8.59x on down day, distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.04)
Low: 0.01
Now: 0.01
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 47.7 | ADX (14) | 97.0 |
| 50d MA | 0.02 | 200d MA | 0.04 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.01 | Resistance | 0.08 |
| ATR Volatility | 381.83%/day | Trend | SELL |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| POL | -6.1% | -39.5% | -88.2% | -89.6% |
| BTC | -3.4% | +16.9% | -5.1% | -16.9% |
| ETH | -1.4% | +27.5% | +5.2% | -23.9% |
| SOL | +2.4% | +27.2% | +11.9% | -27.4% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 30,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| POL | -100.0% | -97.3% | -100.0% | 66 | 17% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (POL)
If you had deployed 30,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -89.6% | 2,607 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -78.0% | 6,607 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -76.2% | 7,135 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -76.5% | 7,042 |
POL Deployment Plan — 30,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Marcus Reid (Long-term HODLer). If you’re managing a 30,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 4,500 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | -0.06 (-765.1%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 8 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Long-term HODLer.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-07-25 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-07-26 | SELL | 0.01 | -85.0% |
| 2026-07-31 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-01 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.1% |
| 2026-08-02 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-03 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.9% |
| 2026-08-14 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-15 | SELL | 0.08 | +0.0% |
| 2026-08-30 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-31 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.9% |
| 2026-09-01 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-09-02 | SELL | 0.01 | -88.4% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
A 30k backtest on a token trading at 0.01. Whatever the model says, position sizing is doing all the heavy lifting at this price level
swapped my last MATIC bags for ETH months ago. SELL at 0.01 feels late to the party but exiting is still the right call
agreed on the exit but the agglayer thesis isnt dead, just early. 0.01 already prices in a lot of pain
early since 2021 is a euphemism at this point. 0.01 can absolutely go to 0.004, ask anyone holding dead L2 bags from the last cycle
early is doing a lot of work in that sentence. they have been saying soon since the rebrand announcement
They have been early since the 2021 marketing blitz. At some point early just means wrong about the timeline
the migration ratio alone wrecked my cost basis tracking. RIP my tax spreadsheet
same, spent a whole weekend redoing cost basis after the swap. my tax software basically gave up on the wallet lol
same here, ended up tracking the swap manually in a plain text file. cost basis cleanup took me three weekends
three weekends and a plain text file is the most honest accounting software in crypto tbh
ADX reading 97 on a token down 89.6% for the year. When the trend signal screams that loud you dont need a 30k backtest to tell you to stay away
ADX 97 on a token down 89.6 percent, at that point the indicator is just describing the funeral
SELL at 0.01 with a 52w high of 0.34. the agglayer pitch from the rebrand era has aged spectacularly badly