Janus Henderson Anemoy Treasury Fund (JTRSY)
1.12
1.12
-0.0%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, golden cross, 50d rising, rising 1m & 3m
Low: 1.08
Now: 1.12
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 100.0 | ADX (14) | 100.0 |
| 50d MA | 1.12 | 200d MA | 1.11 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 1.12 | Resistance | 1.12 |
| ATR Volatility | 0.01%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| JTRSY | +0.2% | +0.6% | +1.2% | +2.5% |
| BTC | +10.8% | +34.1% | +12.3% | -3.5% |
| ETH | +9.1% | +43.5% | +30.4% | -7.7% |
| SOL | +22.0% | +64.8% | +44.8% | -2.5% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 30,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| JTRSY | +0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0 | 0% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (JTRSY)
If you had deployed 30,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | +2.5% | 30,305 |
| DCA — 4 buys | +0.6% | 30,192 |
| DCA — 6 buys | +0.6% | 30,178 |
| DCA — 12 buys | +0.6% | 30,165 |
JTRSY Deployment Plan — 30,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Marcus Reid (Long-term HODLer). If you’re managing a 30,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 4,500 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 1.12 (-0.1%) |
| Target 1 | 1.00 (-10.5%) |
| Target 2 | 1.00 (-10.5%) |
| Entry quality | Extended (R:R 0.28) |
| Max concurrent positions | 8 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Long-term HODLer.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
JTRSY at 1.12 holding flat while it pays out t bill yield, hold is the honest rating here, you collect the yield and log off
Agreed, though I want to see redemption flows before adding more. Tokenized funds are only as liquid as the secondary market behind them.
janus posts redemption flows monthly, the last report looked healthy. if the secondary spread stays tight the liquidity worry is overstated imo
redemption flow report checked out, agreed. the day secondary spreads widen is the day hold becomes watch, until then collect
flows looked fine in the last report, agreed. the day redemptions lag is the day 1.12 stops being boring, until then hold and collect
which venue are you getting jtrsy through? my broker still refuses to touch anything tokenized
same, my broker wont touch tokenized funds either. went through a defi frontend and the spread plus gas ate the first month of t bill yield lol
same story on the defi route, first month of yield gone to spread and gas. fine at 30k like the plan says, under 5k its charity
spread plus gas eating month one is exactly why the 4% headline is fiction for small sizes. fine at 30k, pointless below
depends on the venue tbh, my broker fills were way tighter than the defi route. spread ate like a week of yield for me, not a month
the engine could at least flag fees per venue instead of pretending the 4 percent is universal. spread ate my first month on a defi fill too
went the defi route after my broker refused too, spread cost me about nine days of yield, not a month. venue matters more than the fund at this size
hold and log off, agreed. the RSI 100 box is silly but the 1.12 grind plus distributions has been the boring win of my quarter
the RSI box being wrong every month is basically a site mascot now. 1.12 grind plus monthly payouts, nothing left to do but log off
a HOLD on a treasury fund might be the most sane take on this whole site. 4 percentish still beats my alt bags this quarter
4 percentish with basically zero drawdown while alts bleed, hold and log off is genuinely the strategy. marcus got this one right
4ish percent paid out monthly while my alt bags bleed, the RSI 100 box is comedy but the distributions are very real
the RSI box on a fund that moves half a cent a month is my favorite recurring joke on here. distributions print either way
rsi 100 on a fund that pays monthly distributions is pure comedy. whoever builds these boxes has never met a money market product. holding either way
the RSI 100 box strikes again. anyway, a 4,500 position on a 30k book for t bill yield is the correct amount of boring, approved
boring 4 percent while everything else on my screen is red is exactly why i sized into this. nav grind plus monthly payouts, no drama
the whole debate in these comments is which venue eats less yield. says everything that the biggest risk is the wrapper, not the assets
hold rating with the premium this tight is the boring correct call. the 30k tranche waiting for a wider discount is just laddering discipline
premium under half a percent with monthly payouts, hold is correct. i just drip in monthly and ignore the rsi box, it has literally never been right on this fund
^ chasing yield on a t bill wrapper defeats the point. entry discipline is the actual alpha in a fund this plain