A new stablecoin backed by over 140 companies — including BlackRock, Coinbase, Mastercard, Stripe, and Visa — is being called the most credible threat yet to Circle’s USDC, the second-largest dollar-pegged token in crypto. The project, called Open USD, could reshape how stablecoins share revenue with the businesses that actually use them.
By David Chen | July 16, 2026
The Hook: A Fundamentally Different Business Model
Open USD, developed by a group called Open Standard, is targeting a launch in the second half of 2026. What makes it different from every other stablecoin is its revenue model. Traditional stablecoin issuers like Circle keep the interest earned on the cash and Treasury reserves backing their tokens. Open USD plans to distribute that yield to participating businesses, keeping only a management fee for itself.
That is a direct attack on Circle’s core economics, according to a report from crypto asset manager CoinShares published this week. Analyst Luke Nolan wrote that if Open USD succeeds, it could “push stablecoins further into mainstream payments by making the economics and governance more attractive for the businesses actually using them.”
The consortium behind Open USD reads like a who’s who of global finance and tech. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, Coinbase, the biggest US crypto exchange, Visa and Mastercard, the two dominant payment networks, and Stripe, the fintech giant — all are involved. That level of backing gives Open USD instant credibility that most new stablecoin projects never achieve.
On-Chain Evidence: The Numbers Behind the Threat
To understand why Open USD matters, you need to understand how Circle makes money. When you hold one USDC token, Circle holds roughly one dollar in reserves (mostly short-term Treasury bills and cash). The interest on those reserves is Circle’s revenue. It is a very profitable business — but only because Circle keeps the entire cut.
- USDC circulating supply — approximately 73 billion USD, down from nearly 80 billion in March
- Total stablecoin market — roughly 312 billion USD across all issuers
- Open USD consortium — more than 140 companies, targeting H2 2026 launch
- Circle stock drop — shares fell about 15 percent on the day Open USD was announced
Open USD flips that model. Instead of the issuer keeping all the reserve income, the yield gets shared with the partners who help distribute and use the stablecoin. That gives payment processors, exchanges, and financial platforms a strong financial reason to push Open USD over USDC. Why would Visa or Mastercard keep processing USDC transactions for free when they could earn a cut from Open USD?
The CoinShares report also highlighted a critical timing factor: August 18 is when Coinbase’s revenue-sharing agreement with Circle comes up for renewal. Under that deal, Coinbase receives roughly half of USDC’s reserve income. If Open USD offers a better revenue split, Coinbase — which is part of the Open USD consortium — has a clear incentive to shift its weight.
The Core Conflict: Can Circle Defend Its Turf?
Circle is not standing still. The company recently became a federally supervised bank, giving it regulatory advantages that newer stablecoin issuers may struggle to match. USDC is also deeply integrated across crypto exchanges, DeFi protocols, and payment systems — liquidity that took years to build and cannot be replicated overnight.
CoinShares acknowledged this advantage in its report. The analysts noted that USDC’s “established liquidity and integrations could prove difficult for any newcomer to replicate.” They also pointed out that important details about Open USD — including its reserve structure and exact fee model — remain undisclosed.
Still, the threat is serious enough that Mizuho, the Japanese investment bank, downgraded Circle’s stock to “underperform” from “neutral” and slashed its price target from 85 USD to 50 USD this week. Mizuho’s analysts argued that Open USD’s revenue-sharing model threatens Circle’s long-term economics in a way that traditional stablecoin competitors never have.
The market may be overreacting, though. Circle shares fell sharply on the Open USD announcement, but CoinShares noted that some of that decline was likely amplified by technical selling tied to the Russell index reconstitution — a mechanical event where funds rebalance their holdings, not a fundamental judgment about Circle’s future.
Market Implications: What This Means for DeFi and Stablecoin Users
For DeFi users, the competition between Open USD and USDC could be a net positive. When stablecoin issuers compete, the businesses and protocols that rely on stablecoins win — either through better revenue sharing, lower fees, or improved technology. If Open USD launches with genuine backing from its 140-company consortium, DeFi platforms may integrate it alongside (or instead of) USDC.
However, Open USD is not expected to threaten Tether, according to the CoinShares report. USDT, the largest stablecoin by far, dominates emerging markets and offshore dollar liquidity — a completely different competitive moat that no consortium-backed token can easily crack. Tether’s strength comes from its massive adoption in regions where people need dollar access but lack US banking relationships, not from deals with Wall Street firms.
For investors watching the stablecoin sector, the key question is whether Open USD can convert its high-profile backing into actual adoption. Having 140 companies on a governance list is one thing. Getting exchanges to list the token, DeFi protocols to accept it as collateral, and payment networks to process it at scale is another challenge entirely.
The Verdict: Why Regular Investors Should Care
If you hold USDC or use it for DeFi transactions, watch what happens around the August 18 Coinbase-Circle renewal. That date could determine whether Coinbase begins shifting its weight toward Open USD — and whether USDC’s market position starts to erode.
If you are invested in Circle (CRCL) stock, the picture is more complicated. The company has regulatory advantages, deep liquidity, and years of integrations. But for the first time, it faces a competitor backed by its own distribution partners — including Coinbase, which is arguably the single most important platform for USDC’s adoption in the United States.
And if you are watching the broader trend, Open USD represents something bigger than one stablecoin launch. It signals that Wall Street and payment giants want a bigger piece of the stablecoin pie — and they are willing to build their own alternative to get it. That could accelerate the integration of stablecoins into everyday payments, but it could also fragment a market that has relied on a few dominant tokens for liquidity.
For now, CoinShares recommends watching two things: whether Circle changes its distribution strategy in response, and whether Open USD can turn its impressive list of backers into real transaction volume. Until then, it remains what CoinShares called it — “a credible, but unproven, challenge to USDC.”
The cryptocurrency market remains highly volatile. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
140 companies agreeing on anything is a miracle. but sharing yield with businesses actually makes sense, circle has been sitting on that treasury income for years
140 companies agreeing on stablecoin revenue share is wild compared to circle keeping all the yield
BlackRock and Visa backing a stablecoin that competes with USDC by sharing yield with businesses. Circle had since 2018 to offer this and didnt. now they pay for the delay
BlackRock and Visa backing a stablecoin that eats into Circle margins? USDC dominance is not looking as untouchable as people think
the revenue share model is genuinely interesting tbh. if businesses actually get a cut of the treasury yield thats a real reason to switch from USDC
circle had years to do something like this and didnt. now BlackRock shows up and suddenly its a problem lol
circle had years but the 140 companies including blackrock and visa with revenue share model changes everything for launch h2 2026
Circle keeping all the treasury yield while 140 companies do the distribution work was always going to break. Open USD sharing revenue with participants is a direct margin attack
A consortium of 140 companies including BlackRock and Visa building a stablecoin is significant for several reasons. First, it shows regulatory acceptance of the stablecoin concept. Second, the involvement of traditional financial players suggests we’re moving beyond crypto-native projects to mainstream financial infrastructure.
140 companies and they still need H2 2026 to launch? Circle has years of compliance infrastructure already built. timeline feels optimistic
BlackRock and Visa partnering on a stablecoin that shares yield with businesses is actually massive. Circle keeping 100% of treasury interest always felt unsustainable long term
Priya G. Circle had since 2018 to share yield. they built the distribution network for USDC and now Open USD takes the exact same model with revenue share. brutal
Circle eating competition at 3am rn. distributing yield to participants basically turns USDC into a loss leader for them
Circle sitting on billions in treasury yield while 140 companies do the distribution. Open USD just made that model look greedy overnight
140 companies agreeing on revenue share for a stablecoin launching H2 2026. coordination overhead alone could delay this past the cycle. promising model but execution risk is massive
yield_share_skeptic 140 companies agreeing on anything is a miracle. agreeing on revenue share for a stablecoin launching in months not years is fantasy
Circle sitting on billions in T-bill yield while everyone else does the distribution work. Open USD just made that look embarrassing in one press release
BlackRock backing a stablecoin that shares yield with users. Circle had 6 years to do this and chose not to. that greed just created their biggest competitor