POL (ex-MATIC) (POL)
0.01
0.34
-97.3%
Stage 4 (Downtrend)
Bullish factors: MACD+, strong bull trend (ADX 97.5), vol 2.09x on up day
Bearish factors: price < 50d, price < 200d, death cross, 50d falling, falling 1m & 3m, far below high, distribution (OBV down, vol ratio 0.12)
Low: 0.01
Now: 0.01
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 48.1 | ADX (14) | 97.5 |
| 50d MA | 0.02 | 200d MA | 0.04 |
| Price vs 50d | ▼ Below | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 0.01 | Resistance | 0.08 |
| ATR Volatility | 367.36%/day | Trend | SELL |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| POL | -2.5% | -24.0% | -49.1% | -65.7% |
| BTC | +4.7% | +26.1% | +3.7% | -13.7% |
| ETH | +8.7% | +40.8% | +18.7% | -19.3% |
| SOL | +10.1% | +45.8% | +24.5% | -22.0% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| POL | -100.0% | -97.1% | -100.0% | 66 | 17% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (POL)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | -65.7% | 1,126 |
| DCA — 4 buys | -79.6% | 2,452 |
| DCA — 6 buys | -77.1% | 2,750 |
| DCA — 12 buys | -70.1% | 3,591 |
POL Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | -0.06 (-732.7%) |
| Target 1 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Target 2 | 0.00 (-100.0%) |
| Entry quality | Pullback |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-07-25 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-07-26 | SELL | 0.01 | -85.0% |
| 2026-07-31 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-01 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.1% |
| 2026-08-02 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-03 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.9% |
| 2026-08-14 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-15 | SELL | 0.08 | +0.0% |
| 2026-08-30 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-08-31 | SELL | 0.01 | -87.9% |
| 2026-09-01 | BUY | 0.08 | |
| 2026-09-02 | SELL | 0.01 | -88.4% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
POL down 97% from the high and the backtest still managed to lose 100% of the 12k. how do you even time it that badly lol
the system buys on 50d crossovers and POL has been under its 200d the whole way down. in this kind of chop the fees and whipsaws just bleed you dry
ADX reading 97.5 with price below both MAs is wild. strong trend, wrong direction. classic falling knife dressed up as momentum
Been holding since the MATIC swap. That 2.09x volume on the one up day fooled a lot of people into calling the bottom. It wasnt the bottom.
that 2.09x volume bar was the migration crowd exiting dressed up as accumulation. same trap as every bounce since the swap
Backtest went to literally zero on 12k and the win rate is 17% over 66 trades. This thing ate 12 grand in a simulation. That’s all I needed to read.
Stop loss listed as -732.7%. Whoever built this deployment plan gave up halfway, which honestly matches POL’s chart energy this year.
minus 732.7 percent stop loss. they mathed so hard they invented owing extra money
minus 732% stop loss means it kept adding after every loss. classic martingale cope, of course the sim went to zero
adding after every loss is exactly how the sim produced that minus 732 percent figure. the stop loss never stood a chance
minus 732 was the sim doubling into a 97 percent drawdown. real martingale at least caps somewhere, this thing had no brakes at all
minus 732 only happens when the sim doubles forever. fixed position sizing would have bled out slower and quieter, same destination
the 2.09x volume day in the middle of that collapse is what kept hope alive. every dead cat bounce looked like the migration finally working
SELL rating on something already down 97.3 percent is the most redundant signal in finance. who exactly is left to sell at 0.01
to answer wraithfeed, people like me are left. bought POL at 0.09 thinking that was the floor. now im the exit liquidity the SELL rating is written for
mikkel at 0.09, me at 0.06, we ride the same boat down. at least the SELL rating spares the next guy the martingale sim
mikkel bought at 0.09 and i loaded more at 0.04 because the migration had to work. we are the same person and it hurts
at least you bought the migration story once. i averaged down twice because validators kept saying bridge metrics looked fine
mikkel at 0.09 was rough, but the people who never swapped MATIC for POL at all might be the real exit liquidity now
who is left is exactly the question. half the float probably never even swapped MATIC for POL, bagholders by default at this point
ATR of 367% per day and an ADX of 97.5. Those aren’t stats, that’s a malfunction. Used to hold MATIC since 2021, this migration to POL has been pure pain.
17% win rate across 66 trades and the recommendation is just sell now. the deployment plan had one job and it fed the 12k straight into the shredder
resistance sitting at 0.08 while price is 0.01, thats an 8x just to hit the first wall. the 17% win rate makes way more sense now lol
8x just to touch the first wall at 0.08 and the system still simulated a stop loss that went to minus 732. comedy all the way down
0.08 resistance on a 0.01 price and a 17 percent win rate across 66 trades. the SELL rating is the kindest thing anyone has written about POL this year