Quant (QNT)
174.87
192.74
-9.3%
Stage 2 (Uptrend)
Bullish factors: price > 50d, price > 200d, 50d rising, MACD+, rising 1m & 3m, within 10% of high, strong bull trend (ADX 41.9), breakout above upper band, vol 10.44x on up day, accumulation (OBV up, vol ratio 14.62)
Bearish factors: death cross
Low: 54.01
Now: 174.87
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 93.5 | ADX (14) | 41.9 |
| 50d MA | 68.09 | 200d MA | 69.35 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▲ Above |
| Support | 58.89 | Resistance | 192.74 |
| ATR Volatility | 6.56%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| QNT | +161.3% | +174.7% | +138.3% | +112.8% |
| BTC | +5.8% | +31.3% | +9.7% | -9.8% |
| ETH | +9.0% | +44.4% | +27.1% | -17.6% |
| SOL | +17.4% | +62.7% | +42.0% | -12.2% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 30,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| QNT | -14.7% | +170.1% | -48.8% | 68 | 46% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (QNT)
If you had deployed 30,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | +112.8% | 52,325 |
| DCA — 4 buys | +134.6% | 70,392 |
| DCA — 6 buys | +128.9% | 68,664 |
| DCA — 12 buys | +140.3% | 72,095 |
QNT Deployment Plan — 30,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Marcus Reid (Long-term HODLer). If you’re managing a 30,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 4,500 (15% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 72.16 (-58.7%) |
| Target 1 | 209.00 (19.5%) |
| Target 2 | 232.00 (32.7%) |
| Entry quality | Extended (R:R 0.33) |
| Max concurrent positions | 8 |
Cash reserve: keep 15% buffer. Deploy in 3 tranches. Portfolio style: Long-term HODLer.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
| 2026-09-10 | BUY | 64.54 | |
| 2026-09-11 | SELL | 63.38 | -1.8% |
| 2026-09-12 | BUY | 63.88 | |
| 2026-09-13 | SELL | 63.02 | -1.3% |
| 2026-09-14 | BUY | 64.52 | |
| 2026-09-15 | SELL | 61.17 | -5.2% |
| 2026-09-18 | BUY | 63.26 | |
| 2026-09-19 | SELL | 65.64 | +3.8% |
| 2026-09-20 | BUY | 64.18 | |
| 2026-09-21 | SELL | 66.97 | +4.4% |
| 2026-09-22 | BUY | 73.74 | |
| 2026-09-23 | SELL | 70.63 | -4.2% |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
the 170 retest crowd is right to wait. 9.3% off the high means nothing in QNT terms, this thing gaps more than that on a single exchange rumor
HOLD on a -9.3% day takes guts. 10 bull factors and ADX 41.9 i get it, but the death cross was flashing before this dump and everyone ignored it
death cross is lagging tho, price is still above the 200d. the OBV accumulation and vol ratio at 14.62 tell the better story here
stopped trading crosses years ago, by the time one prints the move is already done. 174 vs the 192 high says the trend guys got chopped
the death cross printed when QNT was trading at 60 something. holding it against a 175 price is fighting the last war at this point
the cross printed somewhere under 70 and price sits at 175 now. anyone still waiting on that lagging signal to mean something missed a clean 2x on the quietest chart in crypto
missing the 2x because a lagging cross hadnt printed yet is the system working as designed honestly. its a filter, not a crystal ball
10.44x volume on an up day but the daily candle prints -9.3%. that smells like distribution into strength not accumulation tbh
or one whale taking profit into a thin weekend book. QNT depth is so bad the same size prints accumulation or distribution depending on the hour
10x volume on a red weekend candle in QNT is one seller clipping thin bids. the OBV line says the same size printed accumulation on weekdays when the book had depth
weekend accumulation on paper, sure. but OBV on a book this thin is just measuring the same three wallets passing chips around
OBV measuring three wallets passing chips around is the most accurate weekend TA anyone has ever written. QNT weekend signals are decoration
10 bull factors vs 1 bear and the verdict is still WAIT lmao. thats QNT in a nutshell, always ticking up and never the exciting one
10 to 1 bull factors and a WAIT verdict is just quant maxis respecting the illiquidity. weekend QNT moves 5% on three candles
@overledger_og thats literally why i hold it. boring is the feature. been stacking since it was under 100 and slept fine the whole time
9.3% off the 192 high and they call it Stage 2 uptrend? The trend-following logic checks out but I would wait for a retest of support near 170 before deploying anything
170 retest crew checking in. QNT weekend candles are thin enough that the 192 high is one rumor away either direction, staging the 30k across levels beats guessing the wick
170 retest squad grows. missed the last 20 points up but ill take sleeping fine over chasing a 93.5 RSI
HOLD at 174 feels right. the 30k deployment plan being staged instead of all-in is the only sane way to play something this illiquid on the weekends
RSI 93.5 with a HOLD verdict is the most honest thing on this page. buying up here is momentum gambling with extra paperwork
RSI 93.5 on QNT of all things is unhinged. feels like three accounts trading the entire weekend book, this coin normally moves a percent and naps
three wallets passing chips around is literally what weekend QNT depth looks like. RSI 93.5 on a book this thin is a liquidity statement more than a momentum one
the weekend QNT book has almost no depth. one OTC desk rebalancing prints whatever candle it feels like
the HOLD is the only adult in the room. 192.74 high with weekend depth this bad means the spread alone eats a new entry before the trend does
spread on QNT weekends is basically a 1 percent tax before you even get positioned. the 170 retest crowd is just avoiding the tax