Circle USYC (USYC)
1.14
1.14
-0.0%
Unknown
Bullish factors: price > 50d, 50d rising, rising 1m & 3m, strong bull trend (ADX 71.3)
Low: 1.10
Now: 1.14
Technical Snapshot
| RSI (14) | 92.1 | ADX (14) | 71.3 |
| 50d MA | 1.14 | 200d MA | 0.00 |
| Price vs 50d | ▲ Above | Price vs 200d | ▼ Below |
| Support | 1.14 | Resistance | 1.14 |
| ATR Volatility | 0.01%/day | Trend | HOLD |
Crypto Performance Comparison
| Asset | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | 1 Year |
| USYC | +0.2% | +0.8% | +2.4% | — |
| BTC | +8.9% | +28.8% | +8.7% | -6.9% |
| ETH | +9.9% | +39.7% | +26.6% | -9.3% |
| SOL | +19.1% | +57.9% | +37.2% | -7.7% |
Trend-Following Backtest
2-year simulation of 12,000 using 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter. Buy when price > 50d MA (rising) + RSI 40-75. Sell on death cross or RSI > 82.
Strategy vs Buy & Hold
| Asset | Strategy | Buy & Hold | Max DD | Trades | Win Rate |
| USYC | +0.0% | +0.0% | 0% | 0 | 0% |
DCA vs Lump Sum (USYC)
If you had deployed 12,000 using different timing strategies over the past year.
| Strategy | Return | Value Today |
| Lump Sum (1y ago) | +0.0% | 0 |
| DCA — 4 buys | +0.0% | 0 |
| DCA — 6 buys | +0.0% | 0 |
| DCA — 12 buys | +0.0% | 0 |
USYC Deployment Plan — 12,000 Portfolio
Analysis by Elena Kowalski (Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value). If you’re managing a 12,000 crypto allocation, here’s the plan:
| Position size | 3,000 (25% of portfolio) |
| Stop loss | 1.14 (-0.1%) |
| Target 1 | 1.00 (-12.2%) |
| Target 2 | 1.00 (-12.2%) |
| Entry quality | Extended (R:R 0.42) |
| Max concurrent positions | 4 |
Cash reserve: keep 25% buffer. Deploy in 2 tranches. Portfolio style: Aggressive / Contrarian / Deep-Value.
Backtest Trade Log
| Date | Action | Price | P&L |
Trend-following methodology: 50d/200d MA crossover + RSI filter + ADX regime gate
Data via Yahoo Finance / CoinGecko · Not financial advice. For educational purposes only.
RSI 92 reading on a tokenized T-bill fund is peak chart-brain behavior lol
RSI 92 is literally just the fund grinding new highs a penny at a time. Any system that reads that as overbought was never meant for yield products.
RSI at 92 on a token that pays you to wait is comedy. The trend system says HOLD but honestly the whole point of USYC is you park the 12k and ignore the chart.
The 12k deployment plan framing is what gets me. HOLD on something designed to sit still. Some things dont need a chart.
@yieldgrave_ disagree, the comparison table is the real story. +0.8% over 3 months while SOL did +57.9%. Thats a massive opportunity cost even with the yield.
Nuno has a point on the +0.8% vs SOL +57.9% gap but thats comparing a yield bucket to a beta trade. apples and oranges imo
Nuno the +0.8% vs SOL +57.9% gap only stings if you knew the top in advance. the backtest logged 0 trades in 2 years for a reason, cash buckets aint timed
the article says 0 trades logged in 2 years and still writes 1200 words. sometimes the smart take is one line: park it, collect the T-bill yield, go outside
ADX 71.3 with 0.01% daily volatility tells you everything. Strongest trend in the room and it moves a tenth of a percent a day. Ill keep mine as the dry powder bucket, not a trade.
Exactly the right frame. 0.01% daily ATR means when SOL inevitably retraces 20% in a weekend my dry powder is still intact. Thats the whole job of USYC.
nobody noticing Target 1 sits at 1.00, which is -12.2% below entry, on a tokenized yield fund near a buck. template was not built for this asset class lol
template printing a -12% target on a near-dollar peg product is my favorite bug of the week. the chart industrial complex needs every asset to be a trade